A straight line

[Martin Weidmann]

Iacoletti = 787 posts in less than two months.

Pretty damn busy, John

A classic BS argument, frequently used by LNs as if it matters.

Whenever Mytton gets stuck he often uses the same crap. Did you get the idea from him, perhaps?

[Martin Weidmann]

Show us where I claim the BY scene is proof of murder
Show us where I have claimed that any single factor on its own is proof of murder

My earlier post:
"However, brandishing a rifle, with pistol on his hip, decked out in all-black getup, clutching commie literature* and posing for the camera might suggest that which you dismiss so easily may be not so far off the mark after all"

Show us where I have ever claimed that I could prove Oswald was the killer

What's the point of a lame "I don't know for sure but he possibly could have" argument?

It means nothing and does not contribute to the discussion, does it now?

Are you sure the original poster claimed that he knew what Oswald was thinking?
Are you suggesting that I claimed to know what Oswald was thinking?
Are you sure that I require your help in this matter?

A person can study Oswald's backstory including the BY scene, the 'killer of facsists' note, George DeM joking around about the Walker attempt, Oswald often calling himself important (according to Marina, and which she also found funny).

I contend that adding the scope to the mix could arguably align with Oswald's known arrogant behaviour.

Who cares about what somebody speculates Oswald was thinking? No matter how you twist and turn it, any argument (or even suggestion) based on such speculation will always be a lame excuse.

Are you sure that I require your help in this matter?

Well, you sure as hell need help from somebody..... but I would prefer it if it wasn't me as I don't really like to waste my time.

[Ray Mitcham]

Stop yelling, and take your meds

Emboldening words is not shouting. Putting words in "upper case" is shouting. Please try to keep up, Chappers.

[John Iacoletti]

I am assuming or inferring that. The actual registration documents for that box were destroyed..

Not before the FBI saw them apparently.

A Hidell was likely registered to receive mail at that box because mail addressed to that name was received at that box.

What mail?  And don't say the rifle, because that would be a circular argument!  However, see the above.

[John Iacoletti]

Oswald denied everything
Marina wasn't in the sniper nest at the time

You sure are a slippery one.  You invoke Marina's amused reaction to the backyard photos to support your notion that Oswald kept the scope on the rifle to look like a sniper when Marina never saw a scope on the rifle. Then you divert back to the sniper's nest, even though you were the one trying to use the backyard photos to make your point.  So much for requiring a scope on a rifle to look like a sniper though.

[John Iacoletti]

Show us where I claim the BY scene is proof of murder
Show us where I have claimed that any single factor on its own is proof of murder

My earlier post:
"However, brandishing a rifle, with pistol on his hip, decked out in all-black getup, clutching commie literature* and posing for the camera might suggest that which you dismiss so easily may be not so far off the mark after all"

Show us where I have ever claimed that I could prove Oswald was the killer

Where did all that come from?  The thing I was responding to was your quote that I helpfully included in the text of my response.

Of course you and your trollmates would think it a lame excuse. After all, both of you busybodies are here to protect the killer of JFK.

"the killer of JFK" is the thing you're assuming to be true in order to make your argument for it being true.

[Bill Chapman]

Without getting a single print on the stock, barrel, bolt, scope, clip and ammo.

Barrel, inside the stock
Carcano stock too rough to hold useable prints
Technology now exists that helps find useable prints on spent shell casings, even when prints have wiped off.

[Martin Weidmann]

Barrel, inside the stock
Carcano stock too rough to hold useable prints
Technology now exists that helps find useable prints on spent shell casings, even when prints have wiped off.

Technology now exists that helps find useable prints on spent shell casings, even when prints have wiped off.


Great. Now all you need is a time machine.