Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A straight line  (Read 164457 times)

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 843
Re: A straight line
« Reply #256 on: March 10, 2018, 06:59:14 PM »
Advertisement


If the slump is severe enough, I suppose it's possible to make a portion of C6 go below a portion of T1. But don't worry, the bullet didn't enter at T1 and didn't exit at C6 anyway.

So you claim. Do my experiment any way you like then post the results, otherwise, x-ray graphics are meaningless.

Quote
If you're going to try this experiment, effect a less pronounced slouch and have the bullet enter over from the C7 bump at the back of the neck. Since the body in the experiment is parallel to the laser paths, the 17? ground laser should strike the front of the neck at a level equal to a point above the jugular notch, as shown below.



Do it any way you like, just do it!

Quote
That's if you've managed to mimic the posture of the President's neck at the time he was wounded. But at least you tried.

I didn't try anything, I described the experiment, which all you LNers either failed to do or didn't like the results.

Quote
Critics don't want it to work and they will cite the 99% of the time when it doesn't work. A sensible margin of error of 10% would cut the failure rate considerably. But you notice Trojan didn't offer it.

You LNers are inconvincible, so why would I post my results?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #256 on: March 10, 2018, 06:59:14 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1825
Re: A straight line
« Reply #257 on: March 10, 2018, 09:54:24 PM »
Just to remind the LNers, re the simple, cheap experiment that will convince them of the path of the MB thru JFK.

ps why haven't any of the LNers posted their results showing the MB did indeed enter JFK at T1 and exit at C6 showing the MB was feasible? (rhetorical)

Why would any LNs try to show that the Single Bullet entered at T1 and exited at C6?

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1825
Re: A straight line
« Reply #258 on: March 11, 2018, 12:17:27 AM »

Thank you for posting this photo Martin. Can I borrow it? Oh, I'll just go ahead and make my observation. I would like someone (CT's) to look at the center car and tell me where a shooter could have been out in front of it. Many CT's (most) claim that a shot went through the front windshield and struck the president in the throat. Where was that shooter?

Wesley, there's no need for you to borrow the photo from Martin. You'll find that photo and many more at the following site;

https://texashistory.unt.edu/explore/collections/JFKDP/browse/?q=boxes

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #258 on: March 11, 2018, 12:17:27 AM »


Offline Wesley Johnson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: A straight line
« Reply #259 on: March 11, 2018, 03:27:41 PM »
Wesley, there's no need for you to borrow the photo from Martin. You'll find that photo and many more at the following site;

https://texashistory.unt.edu/explore/collections/JFKDP/browse/?q=boxes


Thanks Tim. I was just being sarcastic.  :D

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1825
Re: A straight line
« Reply #260 on: March 13, 2018, 03:21:43 AM »

Thanks Tim. I was just being sarcastic.  :D

Well, cut it out. That's not permitted here.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #260 on: March 13, 2018, 03:21:43 AM »


Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 843
Re: A straight line
« Reply #261 on: March 13, 2018, 05:17:57 AM »
Why would any LNs try to show that the Single Bullet entered at T1 and exited at C6?

That's just my contention. Sorry if it destroys your world view. Otherwise, do my laser experiment any way you like, then post the results to support your claim. If you don't, then you are just too lazy to care about the truth. So get on it. :D
« Last Edit: March 13, 2018, 05:31:56 AM by Jack Trojan »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11016
Re: A straight line
« Reply #262 on: March 14, 2018, 10:53:51 PM »
It is really not essential to the case that Oswald owned the gun.

I agree.  The case against Oswald needs to prove that he did the shooting.

Quote
The evidence may not persuade you. But I would venture to say that if you picked any jury and asked them, based on the evidence, whether it had been proven that Oswald owned the gun, they would find that it had.

Why would you venture to say that?  Just because you think he did?  You have to actually examine the evidentiary basis for that conclusion and you're left with an unscientific handwriting "analysis" of a couple of block letters on a photo of a microfilm copy of a 2-inch order coupon and an "order blank" printed from microfilm that is now "missing" showing a PO box box number that Oswald had access to with a serial number handwritten on the form at some indeterminate time.  And a photo with a rifle that (despite what Mytton claims) cannot be proven to be be the same rifle.

Evidence?  Sure.  Evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?  Hardly.  But even if it was, you've already pointed out the problem.  Showing that somebody owned a gun doesn't tell you anything about who fired it at the president.

Offline Alice Thorton

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: A straight line
« Reply #263 on: March 15, 2018, 03:15:51 AM »
You have a good point and observation. I believe that maybe there was more than one gunman but at the same time no one has proof of that and people heard the shots from the building that Oswald was in. But I believe Oswald was only a decoy. Take a look at this article before I say any more to make my point. I have more evidence as well. Skip down to where it talks about the assassination with Kennedy. There is fingerprint evidence mentioned in this article as well.

http://spartacus-educational.com/JFKwallaceM.htm

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A straight line
« Reply #263 on: March 15, 2018, 03:15:51 AM »