A straight line

[John Iacoletti]

Actually Tim, Darby did analyze a left little fingerprint of Wallace's. The problem was, it was a plant.

Isn't it funny how LNers are all about the planted evidence when it suits them.

That's what all this has turned in to. It is just so the CT buff authors can sell books.

Yeah, because Posner, Bugliosi, and Myers didn't want to sell books.  They did it out of the goodness of their hearts.

What kind of publisher's advance do you think Weisberg ever got?

[Wesley Johnson]

Isn't it funny how LNers are all about the planted evidence when it suits them.

Yeah, because Posner, Bugliosi, and Myers didn't want to sell books.  They did it out of the goodness of their hearts.

What kind of publisher's advance do you think Weisberg ever got?

Do you dispute that Darby was played by McClellan and Harrison? Yes john I'm aware that Weisberg did some of his own publishing. It's because what he writes is crap. So John, I'm now beside you up on the fence. Can you tell me what happened that day. Like the buffs are always saying, "the truth finally revealed"! Educate me John. I believe everything you and Martin and Rob have been putting out. Give me the truth John.

[John Iacoletti]

Do you dispute that Darby was played by McClellan and Harrison? Yes john I'm aware that Weisberg did some of his own publishing. It's because what he writes is crap.

No, what you write is crap.

[Wesley Johnson]

No, what you write is crap.

So you don't dispute that Darby was played, Excellent! Now I'm with you on that Fence John. It's getting wobbly, tell me what you think happened? On a different post you stated there may be more than just Oswald did it and a conspiracy. Enlighten me John. Give me some more choices.

[John Iacoletti]

So you don't dispute that Darby was played, Excellent! Now I'm with you on that Fence John. It's getting wobbly, tell me what you think happened? On a different post you stated there may be more than just Oswald did it and a conspiracy. Enlighten me John. Give me some more choices.

I don't know if Darby was played.  I don't know if Garrett was played either.  Or Vincent Scalice for that matter.  I do know that print matching is subjective, prone to bias, and that the criteria for a positive match vary.

[Wesley Johnson]

I don't know if Darby was played.  I don't know if Garrett was played either.  Or Vincent Scalice for that matter.  I do know that print matching is subjective, prone to bias, and that the criteria for a positive match vary.

You ever watch the first Star Trek John? In one episode Spock said something like "if I drop a hammer, I do not need to see it hit the floor to know that it has". That's logic John, which is something few of you have on here. If Spock was here you guys would say, "well Spock, I heard the hammer hit the floor, but my head was turned , so I don't know that it was the hammer that made the noise, and I can't be sure if the hammer really even hit the floor", and on forever. It truly is fascinating, the things some of you come up with.

[John Iacoletti]

You ever watch the first Star Trek John? In one episode Spock said something like "if I drop a hammer, I do not need to see it hit the floor to know that it has". That's logic John, which is something few of you have on here. If Spock was here you guys would say, "well Spock, I heard the hammer hit the floor, but my head was turned , so I don't know that it was the hammer that made the noise, and I can't be sure if the hammer really even hit the floor", and on forever. It truly is fascinating, the things some of you come up with.

If Spock's head was turned, how would he know who dropped the hammer?

[Tim Nickerson]

Actually Tim, Darby did analyze a left little fingerprint of Wallace's. The problem was, it was a plant. Author Barr McClellan along with another author named Harrison gave Darby an old fingerprint card and what they claimed was a latent print and have him analyze them. Of course he said it was a match. When he was told that the only latent print found was a palm print Darby knew he had been played. It was all just so McClellan and Harrison could write a book. That's what all this has turned in to. It is just so the CT buff authors can sell books. That is why people like Harold Weisberg fight so hard against authors like Bugliosi and Posner. It kills their book sells if too many people start believing Oswald acted alone. It is disgusting that they make so much money off of lies and the president's death.

It's not clear to me what you are saying. I assumed that Darby was given fingerprints of Wallace's in order to compare with the unidentified print from the sixth floor. I don't know what you mean by "it was a plant" though. Perhaps you mis worded it. A fraud by Livingston and McClellan may be what you meant to say.