Why do some people believe in conspiracy theories?

[John Iacoletti]

So they must have documented the evidence (and many of the police officers and the FBI acknowledged that the DPD did in fact turn the evidence over to them at midnight 11/22/63.)  They photo graphed and listed the evidence....  But they didn't know some of the information that appeared on the list for 11/26/63 so naturally that info was not listed on the original list.   Is this too difficult for you Johnny?   

Not difficult at all.  You have absolutely no evidence that this particular list existed on 11/22.  It's all imagination and fabrication.

[Bill Chapman]

You know ....Leave it to Chapman to hijack his own thread with silly little tit for tat ludicrous challenges.
This should be called---- Why do many people believe in conspiracies? Saddam Hussein had WMDs right?
Also the thread is supposed to be a poll...what happened there? 1) Oswald did it 2) Maybe Oswald did it 3) perhaps Oswald could have probably done it  4) An idiotic poll.

JAQers/CTers attempt to weaponize single words like 'goodly' in order to deflect. I responded.

Do not misrepresent my 'Probables' poll

My OP is meant for the JFK discussion forum, not the off-topic section. Keep other batshiiittt crazy conspiracy crap to yourself

[John Iacoletti]

JAQers/CTers attempt to weaponize single words like 'goodly' in order to deflect. I responded.

"weaponize".  LOL.

So that's your excuse for misrepresenting evidence?

[Bill Chapman]

"weaponize".  LOL.

So that's your excuse for misrepresenting evidence?

You're JAQing again..

And show us where I 'misrepresented' evidence

[John Iacoletti]

You're JAQing again..

And show us where I 'misrepresented' evidence

You said "a goodly number of these 'couldn't-be-dismissed/may-or-may nots' exist" but you could only specifically identify ONE.

[Martin Weidmann]

You said "a goodly number of these 'couldn't-be-dismissed/may-or-may nots' exist" but you could only specifically identify ONE.

Indeed... and the one he named didn't qualify as "couldn't be dismissed"....

You're JAQing again..

And show us where I 'misrepresented' evidence

You're JAQing again..

Is this going to be your default reply to any question you don't want or can't answer?

And show us where I 'misrepresented' evidence

Looking through your posting history it's remarkable just how many questions you ask whilst at the same time complaining about others asking you questions?.

[Jerry Freeman]

Do not misrepresent my 'Probables' poll

The part about 'idiotic poll' is accurate. If you post a poll then match it with a topic. There are several other such polls posted in the past. Stop bellyaching when you get called out.
How about...1) Oswald did it 2) Oswald didn't do it...?
 

[Jerry Freeman]

You're JAQing again..

Can someone translate this slobbering yolk vernacular. What in hell is JAQ?
Looked it up and got this...   https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Jaq
 Yeah--I don't know about that.