Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The preponderance of the evidence  (Read 49159 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #208 on: April 06, 2019, 02:04:39 AM »
Advertisement
Item #3: Could it be that LHO did practice with the rifle, adjusted it the best he could, made a mental note that it was just a little off target one way or another, and then he could adjust his aim a little to compensate for this?

Sure.  Do you have any evidence that he ever practiced with this rifle?

Quote
Item #4: As I remember, the disassembly needed (so that the rifle would fit inside the bag) involved removing the wooden stock from the metal barrel.

Or maybe that rifle was never in that bag.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #208 on: April 06, 2019, 02:04:39 AM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #209 on: April 06, 2019, 11:44:38 AM »
Cops?  Wade?  Warren Commission?

Evidence of anyone trying to make LHO a patsy (scapegoat) would be evidence of a conspiracy. Do you have any?
« Last Edit: April 06, 2019, 11:59:42 AM by Charles Collins »

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #210 on: April 06, 2019, 11:51:44 AM »
Sure.  Do you have any evidence that he ever practiced with this rifle?

Or maybe that rifle was never in that bag.

I previously stated that I was making no claims. Just asking questions.

If it was never in that bag, why would Jack indicate that the rifle had to be reassembled and the scope adjusted?
« Last Edit: April 06, 2019, 11:52:45 AM by Charles Collins »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #210 on: April 06, 2019, 11:51:44 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #211 on: April 06, 2019, 06:19:50 PM »
Evidence of anyone trying to make LHO a patsy (scapegoat) would be evidence of a conspiracy. Do you have any?

Yes. The unfair lineups, the disappearing initials on shells, and the magic partial palm print that shows up a week later. Just to name a few.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2019, 06:22:42 PM by John Iacoletti »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #212 on: April 06, 2019, 06:22:05 PM »
I previously stated that I was making no claims. Just asking questions.

Where?s Chapman when you need him?

Quote
If it was never in that bag, why would Jack indicate that the rifle had to be reassembled and the scope adjusted?

Because the LN narrative would demand it.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #212 on: April 06, 2019, 06:22:05 PM »


Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #213 on: April 06, 2019, 07:35:50 PM »
Yes. The unfair lineups, the disappearing initials on shells, and the magic partial palm print that shows up a week later. Just to name a few.

Not what I asked for.

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3792
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #214 on: April 06, 2019, 07:39:47 PM »
Where?s Chapman when you need him?

Because the LN narrative would demand it.

Please explain both responses.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #215 on: April 06, 2019, 07:45:14 PM »
I don't know how the WC would go about convincing anyone that he was believable as killer either.

Probably didn't have to frame anybody.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The preponderance of the evidence
« Reply #215 on: April 06, 2019, 07:45:14 PM »