The preponderance of the evidence

[John Iacoletti]

You can make up whatever you want to. And I will be just as interested as I am your invisible dragon.

And I?m just as disinterested in your evidence-less ?Oswald did it? conclusion as you are in my evidence-less dragon.

Which was the whole point of the analogy.

[Walt Cakebread]

Bull.

Latona didn?t get the magic partial palmprint until November 29th.

Bull !....There is a FBI report dated 11/23/63  that says exactly what I said  it did.....

[John Iacoletti]

Bull !....There is a FBI report dated 11/23/63  that says exactly what I said  it did.....

Let?s see it, Walt.

[Walt Cakebread]

Let?s see it, Walt.

John It's been over twenty years since I saw that FBI report....  It is in one of the 26 volumes.....But I can't tell you where to find it....

I debated this many years ago in another forum......

[Tim Nickerson]

The partial palm print (CE 639) was released to the FBI at midnight 11/22/63.....  It was examined in the FBI lab in Washington DC on Saturday 11/23/63, and it was reported as being useless for ID purposes.   

After the conspirators realized they had no solid evidence against Lee Oswald they realized that they needed to have evidence to back up their case and support Henry Wades bold lie . Henry Wade had told reporters that they had found Lee Oswald's prints on the gun...But Wade was simply lying.   

Thus Hoover had the evidence sent back to Dallas so they could slip the palm print into the evidence stream.and manipulate the evidence of the arrest shirt.  ......

Some folks simply cannot understand ( or refuse to believe) that J.Edgar Hoover was THE king pin in the coup d e'tat......

The question has been raised as to who is the biggest Kook on this forum. You are definitely in the running.

[Bill Chapman]

The question has been raised as to who is the biggest Kook on this forum. You are definitely in the running.

Nah, all CTers are tied for first.

As an aside, Gordie Howe once told a referee: 'You're the second-best referee in the league. All the others are tied for first'

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

Are you just going to criticize something that is irrelevant?

Answering a question with a question?
Now you changed this to a game of checkers. Your move
By the way, a preponderance of the evidence is what you brought up.
Are you feeling ok Chuck?

[Bill Chapman]

Are you saying that the conclusions of the WC are somehow better simply because they interviewed more people?

Where did I say that..