The preponderance of the evidence

[Martin Weidmann]

There are only two possible explanations; either Day screwed up big time or the print was added to the record after the fact.

innuendo and conjecture

This is more convincing to me:

The FBI confirmed that the print had been lifted from C2766 when they established that the adhesive material bearing the print also bore impressions of the same irregularities that appeared on the barrel of the rifle. Latona testified that this palmprint was the right palmprint of Lee Harvey Oswald. This finding was also confirmed by Arthur Mandella, and Ronald G. Wittmus.

In other words, Day screwed up big time, but it's no big deal...

[Charles Collins]

In other words, Day screwed up big time, but it's no big deal...

What is important is that the evidence was processed. The delay is understandable, given the circumstances.

[Tim Nickerson]

What is important is that the evidence was processed. The delay is understandable, given the circumstances.

Day held onto the evidence which, as a crime lab officer, he was perfectly authorized to do so.

[John Iacoletti]

Conjecture and innuendo isn?t very convincing.

Then why are you convinced that Oswald killed Kennedy?

[Martin Weidmann]

What is important is that the evidence was processed. The delay is understandable, given the circumstances.

What is important is that the evidence was processed.

Sure, regardless where it comes from, right?


The delay is understandable, given the circumstances.

So, first day evidence isn't important anymore? You can always manipulate the evidence later and claim it was an error or an understandable delay, right?

[John Iacoletti]

This is more convincing to me:

The FBI confirmed that the print had been lifted from C2766 when they established that the adhesive material bearing the print also bore impressions of the same irregularities that appeared on the barrel of the rifle.

A claim without evidence is convincing to you?

Oh wait...of course it is.

[John Iacoletti]

Day held onto the evidence which, as a crime lab officer, he was perfectly authorized to do so.

Did his boss tell him to release all the evidence to the FBI or did he not?

Did he say that there were ridges left on the rifle barrel or did he not?

[Tim Nickerson]

Did his boss tell him to release all the evidence to the FBI or did he not?

No.

Did he say that there were ridges left on the rifle barrel or did he not?

Yes.