Common Ground?

[Charles Collins]

Is there any ?common ground? items that both sides of the controversy can agree upon?

[Denis Pointing]

Is there any ?common ground? items that both sides of the controversy can agree upon?

IMO, Oswald was possibly/probably a low-level snitch for the CIA. Not valuable enough to be a paid informer, not an asset, certainly not an agent but just someone who, for reasons of grandeur, occasionally passed on info.
Does that count?

[Jerry Freeman]

both sides of the controversy

Like a coin...there are actually 3 sides. There is the edge that goes infinitely around.... the probable, perhaps, maybes, coulda- woulda-shoulda.   

[Charles Collins]

IMO, Oswald was possibly/probably a low-level snitch for the CIA. Not valuable enough to be a paid informer, not an asset, certainly not an agent but just someone who, for reasons of grandeur, occasionally passed on info.
Does that count?

Thanks for the reply. I am asking for an item that most everyone on both sides of the controversy would agree upon. Is there anything? This argument has been going on for over 55-years now.

[Charles Collins]

Like a coin...there are actually 3 sides. There is the edge that goes infinitely around.... the probable, perhaps, maybes, coulda- woulda-shoulda.

But no consensus on anything?

[John Iacoletti]

I would say that we all agree that JFK was killed.  But that's not even true.  Patrick Jackson who used to post here had a narrative that involved JFK faking his death.

[Colin Crow]

Ruby killed Oswald.

[Charles Collins]

I would say that we all agree that JFK was killed.  But that's not even true.  Patrick Jackson who used to post here had a narrative that involved JFK faking his death.

Yes, there is almost always the exception. But I imagine that not very many folks agree with him.