Yeah I was wrong, your posts don't imply Oswald was innocent they scream from the top of their lungs that Oswald was innocent.
Nice photo. But where does it claim anything about Oswald's innoncence?
Of course, when you go to the lengths of separating evidence into two parts just so you can present what you perceive to be less incriminating evidence to the court is a stunt only a naive Defence Attorney would try and pull off.
And when you heap on "53 pieces of evidence" most of which aren't actually evidence of anything, then you wind up with a desperate prosecutor with a lousy case.
Both the Warren Commission and a decade and a half later the HSCA studied the evidence and concluded that Oswald was guilty, whereas you and the rest of the CT's haven't concluded squat.
"studied the evidence". LOL.