CT's, how did Oswald's rifle end up on the 6th floor?

[Gary Craig]

Those are opinion polls on Jack Ruby's having just shot Oswald, not on the influence of conspiracy theorists.



Polls tightened in the wake of the Warren Report but widen with the first conspiracy books and debates.

"Those are opinion polls on Jack Ruby's having just shot Oswald, not on the influence of conspiracy theorists."

I have no idea what you're trying to convey with the above.

Here are the pertinent poll findings from the article.

"62 percent of respondents said they believed that more than one person was involved in the assassination. Only 24 percent thought
Oswald had acted alone. Another poll taken in Dallas during the same week found 66 percent of respondents believing that
there had been a plot. There were no JFK conspiracy theories in print at that time"

[Gary Craig]

~snip~

Polls tightened in the wake of the Warren Report but widen with the first conspiracy books and debates.

All that says is the Warren Report doesn't hold up when scrutinized.

[Richard Smith]

All that says is the Warren Report doesn't hold up when scrutinized.

How many people who participate in these polls have "scrutinized" the WC?  I bet half or more haven't even heard of it and less than ten percent have read a single page.  Most people don't know the basic facts fifty plus years later or give a fig.  Their uninformed opinions are worthless.  They are more likely to have seen Stone's wacky, paranoid fueled film and believe "something" may have happened.  What they have no idea.  Or that "one guy" couldn't pull it off for some unspecified reason.  The kind of baseless nonsense that is peddled by many CTers despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

[Walt Cakebread]

Here on the 22nd at about 6:15, Lt. Day can be seen holding CE 139 and the gouge can be clearly made out on the Forestock. Are you claiming that he could have taken Oswald's prints from another rifle?



Boo hoo, how does that change Day's testimony or the physical evidence or anything?

Sorry John, Hoover provided a memo and matching evidence which shows the precise location of a number of corresponding anomalies. The rifle still exists and the Palmprint still exists so your reasoning that this powerful evidence is somehow just a claim is nonsensical. If you or the CT community feels this strongly re this deception then why don't you do something about it and provide an expert scientific refutation or would you rather just flap your gums and rely on voodoo?



And this is the best you got, you're not very good at this, are you John.

JohnM

Mr Mytton....What caused the two parallel lines that are clearly visible in the photo?

Does the 5/8 inch diameter metal barrel of a Mannlicher Carcano have any characteristic that would create the two lines?

[Bill Chapman]

"Those are opinion polls on Jack Ruby's having just shot Oswald, not on the influence of conspiracy theorists."

I have no idea what you're trying to convey with the above.

Here are the pertinent poll findings from the article.

"62 percent of respondents said they believed that more than one person was involved in the assassination. Only 24 percent thought
Oswald had acted alone. Another poll taken in Dallas during the same week found 66 percent of respondents believing that
there had been a plot. There were no JFK conspiracy theories in print at that time"

So everybody believes Oswald was the shooter. Got it.

[John Iacoletti]

Here on the 22nd at about 6:15, Lt. Day can be seen holding CE 139 and the gouge can be clearly made out on the Forestock. Are you claiming that he could have taken Oswald's prints from another rifle?

This photo of Day holding up a rifle is supposed to somehow prove that the print on the index card came from that rifle?

Boo hoo, how does that change Day's testimony or the physical evidence or anything?

Boo hoo.  Just because Day claimed something, that means it's true?  Even if it contradicts what Latona and Drain said?

Sorry John, Hoover provided a memo and matching evidence which shows the precise location of a number of corresponding anomalies.

Yeah, those "corresponding anomalies" are clear as mud.   

[John Iacoletti]

Oswald ordered the rifle.

This cute picture doesn't show that Oswald ordered anything.

Oswald possessed the rifle.

This cute picture doesn't show that Oswald possessed any specific rifle.

Oswald's rifle was found at Oswald's work with Oswald's prints.

"Oswald's rifle".  LOL.  "With Oswald's prints".  LOL.

[John Iacoletti]

If someone says they found Oswald's prints on the rifle, how can that not be the case without some lie or fakery?

Nobody said they found Oswald's prints on the rifle.  Latona found a partial palmprint he identified as Oswald's on an index card.