Is there a point to this nonsense? Seriously, you don't have bigger fish to fry? Get a life.
Bill,
In his futile campaign to prove Oswald innocent, Iacoletti attacks the obvious (e.g., that Jackson saw the barrel of a rifle, and that the reason Jackson didn't see anybody up there is probably because the dude or dudette who pulled it back through the window ducked below Jackson's line-of-sight while doing so), and he pushes the implausible, e.g., that the three women on the Pergola Patio in the Towner film are three really cute guys wearing Bermuda shorts, that the glasses a gal is wearing in Betzner-3 are more likely a dragonfly, a tree branch, a floating shadow, or just way-the-heck too much mascara, and that a gal's dark complexion in Z-frame 60 (and those around it) can be explained by the film's highly localized "color saturation".
LOL
-- MWT