Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Debunking process  (Read 15177 times)

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: Debunking process
« Reply #24 on: June 21, 2019, 08:29:47 AM »
Advertisement
Is there a point to this nonsense?  Seriously, you don't have bigger fish to fry?  Get a life.

Bill,

In his futile campaign to prove Oswald innocent, Iacoletti attacks the obvious (e.g., that Jackson saw the barrel of a rifle, and that the reason Jackson didn't see anybody up there is probably because the dude or dudette who pulled it back through the window ducked below Jackson's line-of-sight while doing so), and he pushes the implausible, e.g., that the three women on the Pergola Patio in the Towner film are three really cute guys wearing Bermuda shorts, that the glasses a gal is wearing in Betzner-3 are more likely a dragonfly, a tree branch, a floating shadow, or just way-the-heck too much mascara, and that a gal's dark complexion in Z-frame 60 (and those around it) can be explained by the film's highly localized "color saturation".

LOL

-- MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: June 22, 2019, 08:14:58 PM by Thomas Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Debunking process
« Reply #24 on: June 21, 2019, 08:29:47 AM »


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1802
Re: Debunking process
« Reply #25 on: June 22, 2019, 07:19:36 PM »
Bill,

Not only does Iacoletti disbelieve the fairly obvious (e.g., that it must have been a rifle barrel that Jackson saw, and the dude or dudette who pulled it back in may have7 ducked below Jackson's line-of-sight while doing so), but he fervently believes in the highly implausible, e.g., that the three women on the Pergola Patio in the Towner film might be three really cute guys wearing Bermuda shorts, instead, that the glasses a gal is wearing in the Betzner-3 photo very well could have been a dragonfly, a tree branch, a floating shadow, or just way-the-heck too much mascara, and that the dark complexion of a gal (self-described American Indian, Stella Mae Jacob) in Zapruder frame 60 (and those around it) was probably caused by ... uhh ... the film's highly localized "color saturation".

LOL

-- MWT  ;)

The guy should spend some time away from this stuff; he's losing it.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Debunking process
« Reply #26 on: June 22, 2019, 07:53:49 PM »
I'm saying that your claim "according to Jackson . . . someone was sticking a rifle out the sniper's nest window" is false.

Mr. JACKSON - Right here approximately. And as we heard the first shot, I believe it was Tom Dillard from the Dallas News who made some remark as to that sounding like a firecracker, and it could have been somebody else who said that. But someone else did speak up and make that comment and before he actually the sentence we heard the other two shots. Then we realized or we thought it was gunfire, and then we could not at that point see the President's car. We were still moving slowly, and after the third shot the second two shots seemed much closer together than the first shot, than they were to the first shot. Then after the last shot, I guess all of us were just looking all around and I just looked straight up ahead of me which would have been looking at the School Book Depository and I noticed two Negro men in a window straining to see directly above them, and my eyes followed right on up to the window above them and I saw the rifle, or what looked like a rifle approximately half of weapon, I guess I saw. and just looked at it, it was drawn fairly slowly back into the building, and I saw no one in the window with it. I didn't even see a form in the window.

Cool

Did anyone else see a rifle in that window, John?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Debunking process
« Reply #26 on: June 22, 2019, 07:53:49 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Debunking process
« Reply #27 on: June 22, 2019, 08:08:35 PM »
According to Bob Jackson, Amos Euins and Howard Brennan, someone was sticking a rifle out the sniper's nest window.  Are you really saying that a sniper was firing from the Dal-Tex from a line of sight passing through the sniper's nest (and past the person sticking a rifle out the window) and down onto Elm Street?

Yep. He singlehandedly had the effect of having both camps unite, momentarily, in gales of laughter.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Debunking process
« Reply #28 on: June 22, 2019, 08:25:16 PM »
Is there a point to this nonsense?  Seriously, you don't have bigger fish to fry?  Get a life.

This forum is only the half of it
« Last Edit: June 22, 2019, 08:30:37 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Debunking process
« Reply #28 on: June 22, 2019, 08:25:16 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Debunking process
« Reply #29 on: June 22, 2019, 08:40:47 PM »
The guy should spend some time away from this stuff; he's losing it.

He started losin it in 2017 upon the release of the JFK files. I noticed he backed off from criticizing his own species somewhat.

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: Debunking process
« Reply #30 on: June 22, 2019, 09:43:16 PM »
He started losin it in 2017 upon the release of the JFK files. I noticed he backed off from criticizing his own species somewhat.

Bill,

Interesting.

Any files in particular?

-- MWT   :)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Debunking process
« Reply #31 on: June 22, 2019, 10:51:55 PM »
Bill,

Interesting.

Any files in particular?

-- MWT   :)

I forget who he was posting to, but he was definitely enthusiastic about the upcoming release... saying something to the tune of making some big progress against the WC findings.
« Last Edit: June 22, 2019, 11:00:26 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Debunking process
« Reply #31 on: June 22, 2019, 10:51:55 PM »