The number one CT nightmare question ...

[John Iacoletti]

So far and as presented in this thread Oswald must have offered some kind of collaboration to be at the correct location to be able to set him up. This, or he did actually do it. Since this has been proven in this thread CT's might as well take this into consideration when elaborating on a theory.

How exactly has this been “proven”?

[Walt Cakebread]

How exactly has this been “proven”?

I'm not sure "WHAT?" Jorn believes has been proven......

[Jerry Freeman]

I'm not sure "WHAT?" Jorn believes has been proven......

English probably is not his first language and things just got lost in the translation.

[Jorn Frending]

How exactly has this been “proven”?

Hello John, I suppose that you always look at this from a legal point of view.

What I think has been proven in this thread is that an innocent unaware Oswald could not have been set up since he could have been anywhere in plain sight when the events took place.

My conclusion is therefore that either he did it alone or was somehow fooled to participate. I can not believe that he would be part of a conspiracy to kill JFK implicating setting up HIMSELF. Therefore those are to me the two only possibilities left.

In any case. In my first post in this thread I refer to a few key answers so that you don't have to read all the pages.

So I hope that this will also answer Walt and Jerry ...

[Walt Cakebread]

Hello John, I suppose that you always look at this from a legal point of view.

What I think has been proven in this thread is that an innocent unaware Oswald could not have been set up since he could have been anywhere in plain sight when the events took place.

My conclusion is therefore that either he did it alone or was somehow fooled to participate. I can not believe that he would be part of a conspiracy to kill JFK implicating setting up HIMSELF. Therefore those are to me the two only possibilities left.

In any case. In my first post in this thread I refer to a few key answers so that you don't have to read all the pages.

Jorn, If Lee thought that he had created a hoax that would make it appear that he had taken a shot at JFK ( just as he had for the Walker hoax) It wouln't have been necessary for anybody to  force him to participate in the hoax.   

So I hope that this will also answer Walt and Jerry ...

[Jerry Freeman]

The suggestion being [as I understand it] ---How would the assassins know that Oswald would not be in plain sight of someone when the shots were fired?
Perhaps he was.
Also..there certainly might have been other employees or pseudo-employees in the building whose whereabouts were not absolutely accounted for at that time.

[Martin Weidmann]

Hello John, I suppose that you always look at this from a legal point of view.

What I think has been proven in this thread is that an innocent unaware Oswald could not have been set up since he could have been anywhere in plain sight when the events took place.

My conclusion is therefore that either he did it alone or was somehow fooled to participate. I can not believe that he would be part of a conspiracy to kill JFK implicating setting up HIMSELF. Therefore those are to me the two only possibilities left.

In any case. In my first post in this thread I refer to a few key answers so that you don't have to read all the pages.

So I hope that this will also answer Walt and Jerry ...

What I think has been proven in this thread is that an innocent unaware Oswald could not have been set up since he could have been anywhere in plain sight when the events took place.

Jorn, I think you are jumping to conclusions way too fast.

I would suggest that you think for a moment as a defense lawyer and first ask yourself what physical evidence was absolutely essential to set up Oswald and how it could be obtained involving Oswald without him becoming aware what was really going on?

Secondly, you could consider how a cover up could deal with Oswald being seen somewhere else in plain sight when the events took place.

[John Iacoletti]

It wouldn’t take a genius to guess that a loner who eats lunch by himself might be off by himself.

This also doesn’t preclude somebody being set up after the fact *because* he was unaccounted for.