.... here's a comparison between dug up Oswald and Marine Oswald and as far as I can tell we see the same teeth, at the same angles with comparable wear in both photos.
JohnM
Hi John,
Thanks for taking an interest in my presentation.
I wrote my presentation from the point of view that two Oswalds are suspected, but not specifically the two boys we label as HARVEY and LEE. Since I repeatedly show a Marine Corps x-ray of only one Oswald, the presentation may leave the impression that only that particular Oswald -- not the exhumed one -- had served in the Marine Corps. For those of us who believe the Harvey & Lee theory, we know that BOTH Oswalds served in the Marines.
The Marine Corps x-ray I examine in the presentation is of LEE's teeth.
The photo of Oswald you show above is definitely HARVEY, the Oswald killed by Ruby. I can tell by that fleshy area between his left eyebrow and his eye. The exhumed Oswald was, of course, also HARVEY. And so it is to be expected that the teeth of the helmeted Oswald above match those of the exhumed Oswald. They are the same person.
The other Oswald, LEE, is the one who was missing the molar. He was also missing one or two front teeth, due to being hit in the mouth as a teenager. In contrast there are no missing teeth on the exhumed body at all. (Not counting wisdom teeth. Which I am ignoring for now as I study the teeth.)
BTW, I will soon be presenting another discovery I've made regarding the teeth. It's going to make the hard-core closed-minded H&L critics look like fools IMO. (Nothing wrong with being a critic, of course. But being closed minded about it and constantly treating believers like kooks and cult members *is* bad.)