CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[Richard Smith]

Anywhere but Texas, would be my bet.

According to Wade, by law, the trial would have to be held in Texas. I haven’t verified that, but I think that you might want to research the law before you actually make that request. 😉

Yes, but don't forget that Martin/Roger claimed to be a lawyer.  LOL. 

[Charles Collins]

Yes, but don't forget that Martin/Roger claimed to be a lawyer.  LOL.

Thanks, now I know who to refer my enemies when they need legal assistance.

[Paul May]

In a 1999 interview Robert Oswald told me Lee was looking forward to a trial and would have confessed.  I asked him how he knew this. He responded “I know my brother”.  For what it’s worth.

[Bill Chapman]

How big was the mirror you were looking at when you wrote that?

Btw your personal attacks and attempts to provoke conflict, rather than taking part in the debate, are getting extremely boring.

Is that worthwhile enough for you?

The 'debate' is nothing more than a decades-long 'Rinse & Repeat' campaign by conspiracy-mongers bent on supporting their pet theories.

[Martin Weidmann]

Anywhere but Texas, would be my bet.

According to Wade, by law, the trial would have to be held in Texas. I haven’t verified that, but I think that you might want to research the law before you actually make that request. 😉

I haven’t verified that

perhaps you should verified it first and then comment on it   

[Thomas Graves]

I haven’t verified that

perhaps you should verified it first and then comment on it   

Verified that that was the law back then, or verify that Wade said it?

[Ross Lidell]

The racism in Dallas and the whole South at the time was massive, it was a powder keg, with bombings etc, this was number one motive as was the fact that J.F.K was a Catholic and this stood to ruin the US UK special relationship and and most importantly a new foreign policy direction.
 If Milteers prediction could have been presented, along with the possibility that another firing point was available, to still carry the same line of fire., and with Oswald himself put into the witness box, to tell us exactly where he was for the shooting, he would have been acquitted.

Social circumstances in Dallas (circa 1963) is not evidence of Lee Harvey Oswald being innocent of shooting John F. Kennedy.

Milteer's prediction [it's in the works] has nothing to do with Dallas. This is too vague and therefore immaterial.

Oswald in the witness box (at his trial)? Very funny!!!

[Ross Lidell]

OJ was from a different era with a sympathetic jury.  Oswald was the most hated man in America and the evidence was overwhelming against him.  A 1964 Texas jury convicts him a thousand times out of a thousand.  Oswald's best legal advice would have been to plead guilty in return for no death penalty.  Something akin to what James Earl Ray did.  The only question is whether Oswald wanted a show trial to espouse his grievances.

As "the Fonze" would say: Correctamundo!