CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[Martin Weidmann]

Did you read the page that was linked to, they were discussing "ideas" that haven't been experienced, like "Flat Earth" or "Leprechauns" whereas these people actually heard the evidence that we are discussing, what's the connection?

As usual I provide the evidence and you call them liars, when will it ever end?



JohnM

So it is indeed ignorance…. got it!

I didn't call anybody a liar, but the fallacy is that even if the majority of people say something happened one way, it still does not mean it really happened that way. Ergo; any appeal to a majority opinion doesn't constitute proof of anything.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

No, the vast majority of the ear-witnesses said they heard 3 shots.

JohnM

A vast majority of people say a lot of things. You are not saying you are influenced by popularity contests? You also have seen the film of many more people running up the grassy knoll or am I confusing that with a film of NO people running up the street to a building that deals with school books or something???

[Bill Chapman]

Perhaps sometimes always but maybe never.
BTW  post-it notes didn't exist until 1979 but unreliable versions were tested the ten years leading up to 3m selling the official post-it in US markets.  I am confident there are no pictures of Oswald with post-it notes all over him. Maybe you probably think there is

I said 'like' post-it notes, professor.
Don't try to be witty, you're just not good at it.

[Bill Chapman]

Being personally sure about something is not a particularly compelling argument.

Are you under the impression that I'm arguing about my personal conclusions? 

[Bill Chapman]

A vast majority of people say a lot of things. You are not saying you are influenced by popularity contests? You also have seen the film of many more people running up the grassy knoll or am I confusing that with a film of NO people running up the street to a building that deals with school books or something???

Why would anyone other than those in law enforcement rush toward a location thought to be that of an armed assassin?

[Martin Weidmann]

Are you under the impression that I'm arguing about my personal conclusions? 

I'm fairly confident that most of the people on this board, most of the time, do not have a clue what it is you are rambling about.

[John Mytton]

You also have seen the film of many more people running up the grassy knoll or am I confusing that with a film of NO people running up the street to a building that deals with school books or something???

Here is a photo not long after the assassination, where did the running people come from?



A little bit later we see a cop running towards the railway overpass but we still see NO one running up the knoll, where are they?



The motorbike cop we saw running towards the railway was followed by the first witnesses and this is NO where near the popular grassy knoll assassin positions?



Here is more people starting to gather, some seem to be moving towards the cop at the railway overpass and still NO one is running up the Knoll steps, where did they come from?



So in conclusion it's obvious that people moved to this end of Elm street because this is where the President was shot and the people who were later running up the steps were not initially that close.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

So it is indeed ignorance…. got it!

I didn't call anybody a liar, but the fallacy is that even if the majority of people say something happened one way, it still does not mean it really happened that way. Ergo;

The corroborated evidence.

81 eyewitnesses out of every 100 eyewitnesses heard 3 shots.



3 shells found in the Sniper's nest.

any appeal to a majority opinion doesn't constitute proof of anything.

Btw it's not up to me to prove anything, all I did was present evidence.

JohnM