CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[John Iacoletti]

I wonder who needs to prove their case to a crazed contrarian interested in nothing beyond playing games on the semantics seesaw...

Right, the rational thing to do is to just believe what Chapman probably thinks happened, for no reason whatsoever.

DA Chapman:  Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I am 100% certain that Oswald probably killed Kennedy.  The prosecution rests.

Jury:  How compelling.  Not guilty.

Judge: Smirk

[John Iacoletti]

Richard,

Not only that, but no witness, with or without the required x-ray vision, came forward to say he or she had watched Oswald like a hawk and seen him step through the doorway that morning with the package, ... so, obviously, "it never happened -- you're making that up".

Right, because in "Richard" and Tommy-land, a wild-ass guess is automatically true unless somebody can disprove it.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof

[Thomas Graves]

Right, because in "Richard" and Tommy-land, a wild-ass guess is automatically true unless somebody can disprove it.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof

"A wild-ass guess," says the man so desperate to prove Oswald innocent.

-- MWT   

[Jerry Freeman]

It's a bizarre form of "logic" that CTers apply to this case.   

It's a bizarre form of "logic" doubt that CTers apply to this case. 
 "I am not a conspiracy theorist"---Jerry Freeman    "We choose truth over facts" ---Joe Biden                                               

[Martin Weidmann]

"A wild-ass guess," says the man so desperate to prove Oswald innocent.

-- MWT   

Why is there a need to prove Oswald innocent?

Did you miss the meeting where they agreed that a suspect is considered innocent until proven guilty?

[John Iacoletti]

"A wild-ass guess," says the man so desperate to prove Oswald innocent.

Wrong again, Tommy. That’s just something you made up to desperately shift the burden of proof.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

Peter,

Nice damage-control "spin" job!

Regardless, now that you've brought it up, why does my posting about "the KGB, CIA, spies, etc," bug you so much?

Do you think Yuri Nosenko, the guy who eventually convinced CIA that the KGB (there I go, again) had had nothing to do with Oswald in the USSR and that there were no moles or triple-agents in U.S. Intelligence ... was a true defector?

Do you think Nosenko, with a little help from some spiteful and underendowed CIA officers, didn't destroy CIA's counterintelligence efforts against Russia and thereby enable someone like Aldrich Ames go undetected for as long as he did (9  years, iirc)?

Do you think Vladimir Putin and his virtual agent, Julian Assange, had nothing to do with "useful idiot" Donald Trump's getting "elected"?

LOL

-- MWT 

I am disappointed with the CIA. I realized they use LSD for all sorts of silly experiments, interrogations etc. Vincent Bugliosi was CIA.   CIA is responsible for spreading LSD all over this country even Chuck Manson's family

[Thomas Graves]

I am disappointed with the CIA. I realized they use LSD for all sorts of silly experiments, interrogations etc. Vincent Bugliosi was CIA.   CIA is responsible for spreading LSD all over this country even Chuck Manson's family

And they made that poor Frank Olson guy take, like, three ounces of it and jump out of a window, didn't they?

And, according to Douglas Valentine ...