Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald? (Read 132683 times)

Jerry Freeman · « **Reply #184 on:** July 04, 2019, 02:46:04 AM »

Quote from: Richard Smith on July 02, 2019, 03:02:13 PM

How can you dismiss the sworn testimony of his own wife?

Answer..Quite easily.

Quote

Every picture or film that I'm aware of shows him wearing his ring . In photos it is difficult to tell but I'm not aware of any photo or film taken during his marriage that clearly shows him not wearing his wedding ring.

So if there is a picture that doesn't show him wearing the ring ...he must have had it on anyway? OK. BTW link your pictures.

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #184 on:** July 04, 2019, 02:46:04 AM »

Denis Pointing · « **Reply #185 on:** July 04, 2019, 01:54:54 PM »

Quote from: Jerry Freeman on July 04, 2019, 02:46:04 AM

Answer..Quite easily. So if there is a picture that doesn't show him wearing the ring ...he must have had it on anyway? OK. BTW link your pictures.

As you're the one trying to prove a point i.e. Oswald didn't always wear his wedding ring, why don't you, 'quite easily' find and post your own pictures showing he didn't? Jeezz, you guys want everything laid out on a plate for you. Do some damn work for yourself!

Jerry Freeman · « **Reply #186 on:** July 04, 2019, 10:30:25 PM »

Quote from: Denis Pointing on July 04, 2019, 01:54:54 PM

.. post your own pictures showing he didn't?

Could it be that none exist and therefore a wedding ring lying on a dresser proves nothing?

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #186 on:** July 04, 2019, 10:30:25 PM »

Denis Pointing · « **Reply #187 on:** July 05, 2019, 12:09:34 AM »

Quote from: Jerry Freeman on July 04, 2019, 10:30:25 PM

Could it be that none exist and therefore a wedding ring lying on a dresser proves nothing?

Research and find out!

Bill Chapman · « **Reply #188 on:** July 05, 2019, 01:55:04 AM »

Quote from: Denis Pointing on July 05, 2019, 12:09:34 AM

Research and find out!

Full designation for Oswald's ring should be 'marriage ring & knuckleduster'

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #188 on:** July 05, 2019, 01:55:04 AM »

Anthony Clayden · « **Reply #189 on:** July 05, 2019, 03:50:08 AM »

People make a lot out of the wedding ring being left but for all we really know he took it off and forget to put it back on.
Personally take mine off every night and then back on in the morning but have a couple of times have forgotten to do so

Ray Mitcham · « **Reply #190 on:** July 05, 2019, 11:02:43 AM »

Quote from: Bill Chapman on July 05, 2019, 01:55:04 AM

Full designation for Oswald's ring should be 'marriage ring & knuckleduster'

You've obviously never seen a knuckle duster.

Jon Banks · « **Reply #191 on:** July 05, 2019, 04:30:08 PM »

The entire case against Oswald is circumstantial

- It can't be proven that he was on the 6th floor when the shots were fired
- It can't be proven that he fired a rifle on 11/22/63
- It can't be proven that he brought a rifle to work on 11/22/63

I say these things as someone who believes Oswald was probably involved with others in JFK's murder.

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #191 on:** July 05, 2019, 04:30:08 PM »

JFK Assassination Forum

News: