CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[Bill Chapman]

Why did he do it? Who put him up to it?

He felt like it.
 
And he didn't need anybody to put him up to it.
(You know, the 10,000-year thing)

They'll remember him now

[Bill Chapman]

Your inferences are legend, Bill. Nobody understands them.

I heard Dirty Harvey physically abused his wife. Characterizing the wedding ring as a 'knuckleduster' is symbolic of said spousal abuse.

My inference is clear.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

For all we know Oswald shot Kennedy.
No one has come forward with a better candidate.
You lot claim someone else? Name, please.

Bill, you are caving in
For all you know he did it?
No one has come forward with a better candidate? And you'll go with a popular candidate to calm public anxiety? That did not work out


So you are not sure about Oswald, instead, you are more like ---I don't know, I guess he did it.

[Bill Chapman]

Bill, you are caving in
For all you know he did it?
No one has come forward with a better candidate? And you'll go with a popular candidate to calm public anxiety? That did not work out

So you are not sure about Oswald, instead, you are more like ---I don't know, I guess he did it.

I remain 100% sure that Oswald probably did it.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

I remain 100% sure that Oswald probably did it.

100% sure probably  = you don't know if he did it

Bill thanks for being honest. I always knew he did not do it

[Bill Chapman]

100% sure probably  = you don't know if he did it

Bill thanks for being honest. I always knew he did not do it

Good for you.

It's cool as long as you don't try to claim that I'm in agreement with your conclusions, Peter.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

Good for you.

It's cool as long as you don't try to claim that I'm in agreement with your conclusions, Peter.

I don't know what cool means, but I can tell you I could never conflate something like "100% sure probably" you did it on your own.  It is like making a bet, it is still just a bet. You could be right but since you could be wrong that is doubt. I could be wrong but oh well I didn't claim he did it and I don't have to prove he did not do it, because he is innocent until proven guilty that is why you can only say "100% sure probably." You could have said that in terms of probability from 0 to 1 you give it a 1, but no, you decided to use probably which suggest less than 1.

[Ray Mitcham]

I heard Dirty Harvey physically abused his wife. Characterizing the wedding ring as a 'knuckleduster' is symbolic of said spousal abuse.

My inference is clear.

Maybe you heard wrong, Bill, and only believe what you want to believe. Hardly a sound case for an inference.