CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[John Mytton]

You mean that bag that both Frazier and Randle said was not the bag they saw?  You mean that bag that showed no evidence of a rifle ever being in it?  That bag that doesn't show up in any crime scene photos?  That bag that the first 6 law enforcement officers in the "sniper's nest" didn't see?  That bag that the police couldn't even agree on where it was located and how it was folded?

That bag?

The bag that perfectly fitted the broken down rifle had Oswald's prints and was found in the Depository.





JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

The bag that perfectly fitted the broken down rifle

And you know this rifle was ever "broken down"....how, exactly?

had Oswald's prints

Let's see 'em.  Oops, destroyed by silver nitrate.  Damn the luck.

and was found in the Depository.

Perhaps you can point it out.

[John Iacoletti]

As usual you're not making any sense, they're my quotation marks because I was quoting you.

And I was quoting Chapman.  So who's not making sense?

[John Mytton]

And you know this rifle was ever "broken down"....how, exactly?

Let's see 'em.  Oops, destroyed by silver nitrate.  Damn the luck.

Perhaps you can point it out.

And you know this rifle was ever "broken down"....how, exactly?

The rifle can be broken down and can be reassembled.

Let's see 'em.  Oops, destroyed by silver nitrate.  Damn the luck.

The prints that were recovered from the bag were from Oswald.

Perhaps you can point it out.

I didn't say they captured a photo of the bag in the sniper's nest, I said that a bag was found in the Depository and that bag was long enough and wide enough for C2766 and this bag had Oswald's prints.



JohnM

[John Mytton]

And I was quoting Chapman.  So who's not making sense?

No, Chapman said anyone of equal hearing in precisely the same place would hear the same sounds and you dishonestly tried to use Chapmans words and apply them to Williams and Jarman.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

The rifle can be broken down and can be reassembled.

But how do you know it was?

The prints that were recovered from the bag were from Oswald.

Of course they were.

I didn't say they captured a photo of the bag in the sniper's nest, I said that a bag was found in the Depository and that bag was long enough and wide enough for C2766 and this bag had Oswald's prints.

...and your point is ?

[John Iacoletti]

No, Chapman said anyone of equal hearing in precisely the same place would hear the same sounds and you dishonestly tried to use Chapmans words and apply them to Williams and Jarman.

Brilliant.  Except Chapman never said "in precisely the same place".  So who's the one being dishonest?

[John Mytton]

But how do you know it was?

Of course they were.

...and your point is ?

But how do you know it was?

The rifle can be broken down and the broken down rifle fits the bag with Oswald's prints.

Of course they were.

Don't tell me there's forged evidence and liars, do you have any proof?

...and your point is ?

It's just more evidence, we have an unexplained, broken down rifle sized bag with Oswald's prints in the Depository.

JohnM