CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[John Iacoletti]

Laughable.  If it was "normal" for employee prints to be on the SN boxes, then where are the prints of other employees?

Seriously, "Richard"?  Not only was one of the prints unidentified, but Truly refused to allow all the employees to be fingerprinted.

  So unlucky for Oswald to be implicated over and over again by bad luck!

Implicated in what?  Touching boxes?

   You also forgot a couple of things Hamburglar.  Oswald's prints are on the long bag as well.

You mean that bag that both Frazier and Randle said was not the bag they saw?  You mean that bag that showed no evidence of a rifle ever being in it?  That bag that doesn't show up in any crime scene photos?  That bag that the first 6 law enforcement officers in the "sniper's nest" didn't see?  That bag that the police couldn't even agree on where it was located and how it was folded?

That bag?

  And his rifle is found on that floor.

"his rifle".  LOL.

And Oswald fled the scene

LOL

not even bothering to ask what was going on after a cop pulled a gun on him.

Is that supposed to be evidence of something?

  And he got his pistol and shot a police officer.

LOL

  Lied about owning a rifle and carrying any bag along the one described by Frazier.  And on and on.  It's a slam dunk.

Too bad your conclusions aren't actually supported by the evidence.

[John Iacoletti]

Oops, indeed! LOL!

Do you need a lesson in what quotation marks mean?

P.S.  Oops again!

If they were all an equal distance away then you may have had a valid point.

I didn't say "equal", you did.

[John Iacoletti]

As discussed many times before, by the form of mislogic the brothers contrarian apply to this case, no one saw Booth shoot Lincoln.

Uh, no one did see Booth shoot Lincoln, "Richard".  What's your point?

No one has to see a murderer pull the trigger to know that he did so.  Many murders are, for understandable reasons from the perspective of the murderer, not committed in the presence of witnesses.  And yet they are solved.

What do you think it means to know something?  Something can be "solved" (whatever that means) and still not be true.

  To suggest that because no one saw Oswald pull the trigger that there is somehow doubt that he did so or that shots were fired from that window when a variety of witnesses place a shooter there

And by "variety" you mean Euins.  Maybe.

and the physical evidence discovered on that floor verifies it is outlandish kookery.

What physical evidence discovered on that floor do you claim "verifies" that shots were fired from that window?  Do tell.

  Even the most desperate defense attorney who knows he has a stone cold guilty client would blush at that bogus defense.  And, of course, there is no attempt to explain the noises above Norman's head if he didn't hear shots.  The best we are left to ponder by implication is that for some inexplicable reason some unknown person stuck a "pipe" like object out the window at the moment of the assassination and presumably beat a base drum before escaping unnoticed.  And a variety of other unknown persons pulled off the assassination and planted all the evidence to frame Oswald.  It is truly wacky, tin foil hat nonsense.

Most of your strawman arguments (ie "implications") are indeed wacky, tin foil hat nonsense.  And yet you persist.

[John Mytton]

Do you need a lesson in what quotation marks mean?

P.S.  Oops again!

As usual you're not making any sense, they're my quotation marks because I was quoting you.

I guess Jarman and Williams just didn't have "hearing ability the equal of Norman's".

JohnM

[John Mytton]

You mean that bag that both Frazier and Randle said was not the bag they saw?  You mean that bag that showed no evidence of a rifle ever being in it?  That bag that doesn't show up in any crime scene photos?  That bag that the first 6 law enforcement officers in the "sniper's nest" didn't see?  That bag that the police couldn't even agree on where it was located and how it was folded?

That bag?

The bag that perfectly fitted the broken down rifle had Oswald's prints and was found in the Depository.





JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

The bag that perfectly fitted the broken down rifle

And you know this rifle was ever "broken down"....how, exactly?

had Oswald's prints

Let's see 'em.  Oops, destroyed by silver nitrate.  Damn the luck.

and was found in the Depository.

Perhaps you can point it out.

[John Iacoletti]

As usual you're not making any sense, they're my quotation marks because I was quoting you.

And I was quoting Chapman.  So who's not making sense?

[John Mytton]

And you know this rifle was ever "broken down"....how, exactly?

Let's see 'em.  Oops, destroyed by silver nitrate.  Damn the luck.

Perhaps you can point it out.

And you know this rifle was ever "broken down"....how, exactly?

The rifle can be broken down and can be reassembled.

Let's see 'em.  Oops, destroyed by silver nitrate.  Damn the luck.

The prints that were recovered from the bag were from Oswald.

Perhaps you can point it out.

I didn't say they captured a photo of the bag in the sniper's nest, I said that a bag was found in the Depository and that bag was long enough and wide enough for C2766 and this bag had Oswald's prints.



JohnM