Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 127469 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #352 on: July 21, 2019, 04:49:04 AM »
Advertisement
And I'm talking about Norman's position, not that of Jarman or BRW

 Thumb1:

Thanks Bill, it's obvious what you meant, if you're comparing "equal" hearing then you can't have the test subject on Elm street or in New York or on the Moon that just doesn't make sense, they have to be in the same position or what's the point?

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #352 on: July 21, 2019, 04:49:04 AM »


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1844
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #353 on: July 25, 2019, 08:44:28 AM »
"In court how would you defend Oswald?"

Demand the autopsy materials be allowed in court.

Have the autopsy doctors explain in court their conclusions illustrated by the autopsy photos. (Assuming the autopsy photos of the inside of JFK's right lung, that would have shown the direction and path of the bullet that allegedly went through his neck, and the photo of the inside of the skull, after the brain was removed. that showed the wound near the EOP, were still amongst the autopsy materials.) Those photos are no longer in the archives.

In 1967 the autopsy pathologists (Humes, Boswell, and Finck), the acting chief of radiology (Ebersole) and one of the autopsy photographers (Stringer) viewed the autopsy photographs and/or X-rays and confirmed the photos and X-rays were accurate in the portrayal of the wounds of the President.

The Clark Panel studied the autopsy X-rays and photos and concluded that the head was struck only once and from above and behind.

The Rockefeller Commission studied the autopsy X-rays and photos and concluded that the head was struck only once and from behind.

The HSCA forensic panel studied the autopsy X-rays and photos (and interviewed the Kennedy autopsy personnel in order to verify the validity of the photos and X-rays) and concluded that the head was struck once and only from behind.
« Last Edit: November 27, 2019, 10:28:19 PM by Bill Brown »

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1844
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #354 on: July 25, 2019, 08:49:21 AM »
"In court how would you defend Oswald?"

I would have JBC and his wife testify in front of the jury that he was not hit by the same bullet that hit JFK.

John Connally heard the first.  He knew for a fact that he was not hit by this shot.  He mistakenly assumed that the President was hit by this shot.

John Connally knew he was hit by the next shot.  He knew that the President was hit in the head by the final shot.  He knew that the President was hit only twice.  Since he mistakenly assumed that the President was hit by the first shot, he also mistakenly assumed that this second shot (which did hit him) did not hit the President.

The Zapruder film verifies that these two men were NOT hit by separate shots.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #354 on: July 25, 2019, 08:49:21 AM »


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1844
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #355 on: July 25, 2019, 08:50:25 AM »
"In court how would you defend Oswald?"
Brennan would need to explain to a jury why his affidavit from 11/22/63 stated he could identify the person he allegedly saw fire from the

6th floor, yet he was unable to pick LHO from a police line up later that afternoon.

Straw man.  Howard Brennan would not be called by the Prosecution.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1844
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #356 on: July 25, 2019, 08:51:21 AM »
Absolutely, not long after Weidmann first started posting both Bill and I independently made posts accusing Weidmann of being Roger Collins, so I gathered all the evidence from Bill, others and myself and made a Poll Thread. The Poll results were dramatically in favour of Weidmann either being Collins or Weidy used a dozen Collins posts as an exact template for his own.

JohnM

That's correct.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #356 on: July 25, 2019, 08:51:21 AM »


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1844
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #357 on: July 25, 2019, 09:24:28 AM »
As I have stated previously, I think that the three had a conversation before Williams departed the TSBD that was designed to protect him.

The above doesn't lend itself to subscribing to this (below):

I believe BRW saw the assassin too. Just trying to work out a senario that was non-threatening enough for him to vacate his position but take up one a floor lower. Might he have seen Jarman and Norman heading back? Remember though he was not particularly close to those two.

So Bonnie Ray Williams was not particularly close to Junior Jarman and Harold Norman, yet Jarman and Norman have a conversation with Williams designed to "protect" Williams from something related to the murder of the President of the United States of America.  That's difficult to get on board with.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1844
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #358 on: July 25, 2019, 09:29:23 AM »
Frazier said to Tom Meros that Oswald was so far ahead of him by the time he entered the annex (not the building) that he couldn't tell whether he was still carrying the package or not.  So, the evidence that Oswald carried ANYTHING into the TSBD?  Big fat squat.

"Frazier said to Tom Meros"  LOL


"I saw him go in the back door at the Loading Dock of the building that we work in, and he still had the package under his arm." -- Buell Wesley Frazier (affidavit, 11/22/63)

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1844
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #359 on: July 25, 2019, 09:52:27 AM »
A vast majority of people say a lot of things. You are not saying you are influenced by popularity contests? You also have seen the film of many more people running up the grassy knoll or am I confusing that with a film of NO people running up the street to a building that deals with school books or something???


Quote
You also have seen the film of many more people running up the grassy knoll...

Do you mean film of many people running up the knoll AFTER every single vehicle in the motorcade has passed through?  How much time do you believe passed between the last shot and "many more people running up the grassy knoll"?


Quote
or am I confusing that with a film of NO people running up the street to a building that deals with school books or something???

Marrion Baker is seen on film immediately running towards the front entrance of the building that deals with school books.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2019, 10:19:20 AM by Bill Brown »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #359 on: July 25, 2019, 09:52:27 AM »