No one saw anyone bring a rifle into the TSBD. Yet it was there. So we know that someone did. Oswald was in the process of committing a crime. He took measures to avoid being seen carrying a rifle into the building. Like wrapping it up in a paper bag and then hiding it. You appear to be suggesting that unless a witness had x-ray vision then it can't be proven that Oswald carried the rifle.
I know you don't like it, "Richard", but that's the nature of what it means to prove something. If you have no evidence whatsoever that Oswald carried a rifle into the building (and you don't), then you don't get to claim that you've proven it.
Absurd. How do we know it was him? He carried a long package into work that morning then lied about it.
Misinformation, no matter how confidently stated is misinformation. The only way you can claim that he lied about it is by assuming that your conclusion is true.
A long bag was found next to the SN with his prints.
You don't know where it was found. The cops didn't even agree where it was found. There's also no evidence that a rifle was ever in that bag or that it was the bag that Frazier saw. Frazier said it was not.
The rifle found in the building had the same serial number as the one ordered under an alias that Oswald used.
You have no evidence of Oswald ever using that name as an alias for himself.
It was sent to his PO Box.
You have no evidence of such a rifle ever going through the postal service, being delivered to that PO box, or being picked up by Oswald or anyone else.
His prints were on that rifle.
No, some prints were found by the trigger guard that were useless for identification purposes, and a single partial palmprint showed up a week later on an index card.
It can't be linked to any other person.
or to Oswald.
He is pictured holding it.
No, he's pictured holding a rifle that may or may not be the same one.
His wife confirms he owned a rifle and that it was stored in the Paine's garage.
No, she confirmed that she peeked in the end of a rolled up and tied blanket 6 weeks earlier and saw part of a wooden stock that she took to be a rifle.
There is no accounting for that rifle except as the one found in the TSBD.
There is no accounting that the rifle allegedly found in the TSBD was the same thing Marina saw.
It is a slam dunk.
Only to somebody who misrepresents the evidence.
Difficult to understand how there could possibly be anymore evidence than exists to link Oswald to the rifle.
Difficult to understand why you keep trotting out conclusions that aren't supported by the actual evidence and calling them evidence.
