Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?  (Read 118392 times)

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #512 on: August 14, 2019, 01:58:29 PM »
Advertisement
   The government admitted that Olson had been dosed with LSD, without his knowledge, nine days before his death. After the family announced they planned to sue the Agency over Olson's "wrongful death," the government offered them an out-of-court settlement of $1,250,000, later reduced to $750,000, which they accepted. The family received apologies from President Gerald Ford and then-CIA director William Colby.

Dear Peter,

Oh well, stuff happens.

At least they didn't dose him with Novichok, Dioxin, or Polonium Tea.

-- MWT  ;)

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #512 on: August 14, 2019, 01:58:29 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #513 on: August 14, 2019, 04:51:57 PM »
There is no "burden of proof" outside the criminal justice system which is designed to protect the rights even of the guilty.

You have just confirmed your utter ignorance.  Any truth claim has a burden of proof associated with it.  The fact that you are trying to sidestep the burden of proving your own many claims about the evidence shows how profoundly bankrupt your position is.

This is Logic 101, "Richard".

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #514 on: August 14, 2019, 04:53:41 PM »
How in the world are you even remotely qualified to make a determination of what an "honest assessment of the facts and evidence" would be?

"Richard" is the guy who keeps bleating "he was photographed with the rifle" over and over again.

"Honest assessment" my aunt Fanny.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #514 on: August 14, 2019, 04:53:41 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #515 on: August 14, 2019, 08:41:53 PM »
"Richard" is the guy who keeps bleating "he was photographed with the rifle" over and over again.

"Honest assessment" my aunt Fanny.

 ???

He wasn't photographed with a Carcano?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #516 on: August 14, 2019, 08:53:07 PM »
???

He wasn't photographed with a Carcano?

How would he know that this is a Carcano at all, much less THE Carcano (the one allegedly found on the sixth floor)?  Or that the Carcano allegedly found on the sixth floor is even the murder weapon for that matter.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #516 on: August 14, 2019, 08:53:07 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #517 on: August 14, 2019, 08:55:17 PM »
Why?  You've never shown a single piece of evidence that Oswald was a shooter, Holmes.

'single piece of evidence'

Now there's a Freudian Slip if I ever saw one, Watson...
« Last Edit: August 14, 2019, 08:57:56 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #518 on: August 14, 2019, 08:59:26 PM »
'single piece of evidence'

Now there's a Freudian Slip if I ever saw one, Watson...

Translation?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?
« Reply #519 on: August 14, 2019, 09:09:46 PM »