CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[Bill Chapman]

When did I ever appoint myself as "Devil's Advocate"?

Why the horns, John?

[John Iacoletti]

Why the horns, John?

Ask the guy who made the drawing.

[Bill Chapman]

"Richard" believes it's the Carcano, do you disagree?  But I'll bite.  What makes you think it's a Carcano in the backyard photos?

Are you claiming the design of the Carcano is common with some other bolt-action rifle?
Oh btw, do you believe the BYP fake?

[John Iacoletti]

Are you claiming the design of the Carcano is common with some other bolt-action rifle?

I'm not claiming anything.  What makes you think it's a Carcano in the backyard photos?

Oh btw, do you believe the BYP fake?

Define "fake".

[Bill Chapman]

Ask the guy who made the drawing.

Why? You're the one using the drawing. And JerryO is the guy who did the drawing if I remember correctly... and am I wrong in recalling you explaining DevAd connection with the horns?

[Bill Chapman]

I'm not claiming anything.  What makes you think it's a Carcano in the backyard photos?

Define "fake".

 

[Bill Chapman]

If this is not a belief, then what do you call it?

Here, let me demonstrate the word 'believe' in a sentence:

"I believe you've weaponized the word both here and on TAE"

 

[Bill Chapman]

What it your source for this quote?

There is no "whole of the evidence".  Just a few weak and circumstantial things that are all questionable, impeachable, arguable, or tainted in some way, and a boatload of speculation and conjecture.

What it your source for this quote?
>>> Huh? You post here as if this was a court of law, yet don't know that basic tenet?
Look it up, 'researcher'.
 
Oswald was the one 'tainted in some way'
He might as well have worn a tshirt saying 'Just Did It'

Everything is arguable to a guy openly demonstrating his contrarianism by using devil's horns on his portrait.

It's the CT Ship of Fools that has the 'boatload full of speculation and conjecture'.