CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[Denis Pointing]

I did.

Colin, stop stirring the pot for Christ's sake. Aren't things bad enough between those two. 

[Colin Crow]

Colin, stop stirring the pot for Christ's sake. Aren't things bad enough between those two. 

But I did Denis..... . I assume we are all after the truth.

I also posted this......

Gee Bill, how can every post of yours be better than the next one?

I wonder whether that is as clear to you as it is to most of us. 

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2031.msg57813.html#msg57813

[Denis Pointing]

But I did Denis..... . I assume we are all after the truth.

I also posted this......

Gee Bill, how can every post of yours be better than the next one?

I wonder whether that is as clear to you as it is to most of us. 

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2031.msg57813.html#msg57813

Yeah, I saw that one, very clever, very subtle..I wish I'd thought of it first...in fact, I may just pretend I did. To hell with the truth. 

[Colin Crow]

Yeah, I saw that one, very clever, very subtle..I wish I'd thought of it first...in fact, I may just pretend I did. To hell with the truth. 

I can't claim authorship Denis. Not sure where I heard it and whether whoever said it was the originator too. But it is a goodun' 

I think my lemming comment was posted before the last forum crash. But I have to own up. Not sure if John "plagiarised".

[Bill Chapman]

I never called you a lemming.

You talk the talk.
I walk the walk:





You acknowledged that later.
   

[Bill Chapman]

I did.

So did John.
And he acknowledged that later.
Yet here he is denying it again 

Careful who you decide to believe, Colin

[Thomas Graves]

So did John.
And he acknowledged that later.
Yet here he is denying it again 

Careful who you decide to believe, Colin

Someone should explain to Iacoletti that there's an infinite number of Conspiracy Theories, each with its own "fact pattern," but only one Oswald-Did-It-By-Himself scenario.

D'oh

--  MWT 

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

When his arguments get dismantled he resorts to attacking the dismantler.

He takes the easy side of the debate which was all laid out by the framers ( Oswald did it, the cops found a gun) and then wants anyone with an opposing view to prove he's wrong when he is wrong. I bet his posts are typed by someone else while he dictates