CT's, in court how would you defend Oswald?

[Rick Plant]

Point out where I ever claimed the WC a courtroom.

So, you feel a person can state false claims anywhere but not just in a courtroom?

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

Tell us what stance I've 'reversed'

I don't have to show anything by your standard, remember it's not a courtroom? See it is an ongoing thing with you-you can't make up your mind but you can make it up as you go along. Very defensive and unsure of yourself. Flip flop waffle master

[Bill Chapman]

Dear Peter,

You mean Buell Wesley Frazier didn't say (under penalty of perjury) that he saw, with his very own 20/20 eyeballs, Lee Harvey Oswald not only carry that long package into the building that morning, but assemble the rifle up there in the sniper's nest, as well?

Gosh darn it, I guess Oswald was innocent, after all, huh.

-- MWT

Probably not

 

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

Probably not

 

Nope, Frazier didn't say that he saw LHO bring in a rifle,  he did not say LHO assembled a rifle and also did not say anything about a sniper's nest.  What else you got, anything from the Dirty Brown Shirt handbook of lies?

[Bill Chapman]

Nope, Frazier didn't say that he saw LHO bring in a rifle,  he did not say LHO assembled a rifle and also did not say anything about a sniper's nest.  What else you got, anything from the Dirty Brown Shirt handbook of lies?

Wow

[Michael Walton]

The whole premise of the Lone Nut only case is this...

That 3 shots were fired. The first shot went through his upper back throat and didn't exit came out of this throat and went on to hit Connally.

The second shot just missed wildly, kicking up concrete way down by the underpass and nicking a bystander.

The third hit him in the head throwing his head forcefully toward the rear defying the laws of physics.

That, in and of itself, is a great starting point to argue against the official theoretical conclusions in a court of law by a team of lawyers for the dead defendant.

[Bill Chapman]

He didn’t say “reversed”. Fake quoter!

Well?

[Dan O'meara]

How would I defend Oswald in court?

I'd point out all the lies and deceit in the testimonies of various TSBD employees and make the easy case that there was grounds for collusion beyond the "Oswald the Loner" angle.
It is beyond doubt that some of the employees are lying in their testimonies.
If it was a simple case that Oswald acted alone there would be no need for all these falsehoods.
Everything would be really straight-forward. Innocent folk describing where they were and what they were doing at the time of the assassination.
But that's not what we see.
What we see in the testimonies of quite a few of the TSBD employees is a labyrinthine complex of lies and deceit.

Reasonable Doubt that Oswald acted alone would be one of the easiest arguments to make ever.