Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee  (Read 41175 times)

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #56 on: February 13, 2018, 09:39:21 AM »
Advertisement

John,

Oswald's March 27, 1958 dental record indicates that on or around May 5, 1958 a failure occurred that required Oswald to get a new prosthesis (false tooth). The record lists all treatments performed by that particular dentist. The new prosthesis is not listed. Obviously either another dentist provided the prosthesis, or Oswald never got one.

Regardless, if you look at the teeth of exhumed Oswald, you will see that all his teeth are natural, that he has no prostheses, and that there is no place for prosthesis to fit. Which is strange, to say the least, for a person who needed a prosthesis.

Photos of Oswalds exhumed teeth can be found on page 27 of the Norton Report:

http://harveyandlee.net/Teeth1/norton_report_with_high_quality_images.pdf


You say that, "If Oswald needed a prosthetic then that would be noted as a yes and the missing teeth number# and details of repair would be written."

That is an assumption you are making that is demonstrably untrue. It states right there in the "Prosthesis Required?" field that if the answer is "yes," the dentist is to indicate so by writing a brief description. No need to write "yes." No need to give details.

I can only guess why details would not be requested or needed. Perhaps the Marine Corps used specialists for any treatment more sophisticated than treating cavities. Indeed, I recall the days when one had to see a specialist just to get a root canal.

Just a guess, I haven?t looked closely at the debate regarding the missing tooth, but could "failed" refer to a failure to attend on 5/5? That?s why he attended 9 days later. Normally this is recorded as an FTA. Apologies if I am a doofus.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2018, 10:10:34 AM by Colin Crow »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #56 on: February 13, 2018, 09:39:21 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4277
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #57 on: February 13, 2018, 09:53:34 AM »

John,

Oswald's March 27, 1958 dental record indicates that on or around May 5, 1958 a failure occurred that required Oswald to get a new prosthesis (false tooth). The record lists all treatments performed by that particular dentist. The new prosthesis is not listed. Obviously either another dentist provided the prosthesis, or Oswald never got one.

Regardless, if you look at the teeth of exhumed Oswald, you will see that all his teeth are natural, that he has no prostheses, and that there is no place for prosthesis to fit. Which is strange, to say the least, for a person who needed a prosthesis.

Photos of Oswalds exhumed teeth can be found on page 27 of the Norton Report:

http://harveyandlee.net/Teeth1/norton_report_with_high_quality_images.pdf


You say that, "If Oswald needed a prosthetic then that would be noted as a yes and the missing teeth number# and details of repair would be written."

That is an assumption you are making that is demonstrably untrue. It states right there in the "Prosthesis Required?" field that if the answer is "yes," the dentist is to indicate so by writing a brief description. No need to write "yes." No need to give details.

I can only guess why details would not be requested or needed. Perhaps the Marine Corps used specialists for any treatment more sophisticated than treating cavities. Indeed, I recall the days when one had to see a specialist just to get a root canal.



Hi Sandy, I had another look at the school photo and matched up some teeth which even though were perfect and needed a little perspective correction you can see what teeth were visible in the Oswald school photo. I'm sure if someone digitized a 3D set of teeth from the exhumed Oswald we would have a close to perfect match.











JohnM


« Last Edit: February 13, 2018, 12:17:44 PM by John Mytton »

Offline Sandy Larsen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #58 on: February 14, 2018, 12:28:45 PM »


Hi Sandy, I had another look at the school photo and matched up some teeth which even though were perfect and needed a little perspective correction you can see what teeth were visible in the Oswald school photo. I'm sure if someone digitized a 3D set of teeth from the exhumed Oswald we would have a close to perfect match.




JohnM


John,

That's interesting. I don't buy it because of the corroborating evidence, but it's interesting.

Regardless, for argument's sake I will concede. Because the loss-of-tooth evidence isn't even necessary for my proof.

How do you explain that in 1958 Oswald was missing a tooth and needed a fake one (a prosthesis) to replace it, but in 1981 no longer needed it? Did a tooth grow back while he was dead?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #58 on: February 14, 2018, 12:28:45 PM »


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #59 on: February 14, 2018, 04:46:50 PM »


Hi Sandy, I had another look at the school photo and matched up some teeth which even though were perfect and needed a little perspective correction you can see what teeth were visible in the Oswald school photo. I'm sure if someone digitized a 3D set of teeth from the exhumed Oswald we would have a close to perfect match.











JohnM
Yet another of Mytton's clever deceptions. This time though his animation doesn't work as you can see the teeth just behind his top lip. Nice try. Mytton.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4277
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #60 on: February 15, 2018, 12:13:05 AM »
Yet another of Mytton's clever deceptions. This time though his animation doesn't work as you can see the teeth just behind his top lip. Nice try. Mytton.



Who's trying to deceive who!?, all I'm doing is showing that they're all Oswald.

Here's the schoolboy photo of Oswald No.1 who apparently has the missing teeth and needed prosthetics Vs Oswald No.2 as a Marine with the teeth that match the Exhumed Oswald without missing teeth.
As the image rotates we again see perfect synchronicity in all the relative positions of each of Oswald's facial features proving they're both the same person and now we can determine beyond all doubt that the teeth that can be seen in the school photo are underneath.









JohnM
« Last Edit: February 22, 2018, 12:20:09 AM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #60 on: February 15, 2018, 12:13:05 AM »


Offline Sandy Larsen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #61 on: February 18, 2018, 11:47:42 AM »

As the image rotates we again see perfect synchronicity in all the relative positions of each of Oswald's facial features proving they're both the same person and now we can determine beyond all doubt that the teeth that can be seen in the school photo are underneath.



JohnM


As the image changes we again see perfect synchronicity in all the relative positions of each of Ted Cruz's facial features, proving they're both the same person. And now we have determined beyond all doubt that MORPHING can be used in attempts to fool people.



« Last Edit: February 18, 2018, 12:02:19 PM by Sandy Larsen »

Offline Sandy Larsen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #62 on: February 18, 2018, 12:00:11 PM »

JohnM


BTW John, I'm still waiting for you to explain how it is that the 1958 Oswald required a false tooth (prosthesis) according to his dental record, yet the 1981 exhumed Oswald had neither a false tooth nor any place where a false tooth could fit?

Why don't you morph on that for a while. LOL
« Last Edit: February 19, 2018, 12:54:25 PM by Sandy Larsen »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4277
Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #63 on: February 18, 2018, 01:07:13 PM »

As the image changes we again see perfect synchronicity in all the relative positions of each of Ted Cruz's facial features, proving they're both the same person. And now we have determined beyond all doubt that MORPHING can be used in attempts to fool people.






I was waiting for this comeback, when you morph two different people with their own unique depth mapping as in your example all you're doing is smearing everything in a two dimensional plane whereas the same person in different perspectives gives you a clean three dimensional rotation with all the facial features rotating in synchronicity.

In your example we can see immediately that they are different people because all the facial features are moving independently the bone structure is different and the head shape is different, thanks!



Now here is Ted Cruz looking up and down and because all of his features are in the same position in 3D space so again like ALL the Oswald's have perfect rotation as opposed to the random smearing in your example above.



And here's Grandpa and when it's the same person the rotation is perfect.



And finally here's Cruz and Grandpa showing no rotating synchronicity because even though they are similar at the end of the day the ears, nose, cheekbones and general structure are all vastly different, so opposed to the smooth coordinated movement of the above, the following just looks like the faces are being pulled in random 2D directions, essentially proving they are different.







JohnM
« Last Edit: February 18, 2018, 03:01:27 PM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Indisputable Evidence for Harvey & Lee
« Reply #63 on: February 18, 2018, 01:07:13 PM »