Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Joseph Sanchez

Author Topic: Why the first shot missed  (Read 52736 times)

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: Why the first shot missed
« Reply #240 on: January 30, 2025, 11:25:54 PM »
Advertisement
Just in the vacant recesses of your skull.

Cool insult, bro.

I suppose you consider that “circumstantial evidence” against Oswald too.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Why the first shot missed
« Reply #240 on: January 30, 2025, 11:25:54 PM »


Online Tom Mahon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
Re: Why the first shot missed
« Reply #241 on: Today at 01:14:18 AM »
I suppose you consider that “circumstantial evidence” against Oswald too.

John Iacoletti seems to believe that circumstantial evidence isn't really evidence.

Online Tom Mahon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
Re: Why the first shot missed
« Reply #242 on: Today at 01:17:20 AM »
Yes she did. And Ruth Paine testified that she was the one who found it. One of Marina’s statements (CD79) said she saw it lying on top of the dresser. Nothing about a cup. Another one of here statements (CE1820) said that the police found it. An FBI report (FBI 105-82555 Oswald HQ File, Section 16, p. 93) says that the police found it on the dresser.

Was there ever a ring there, and was it actually in a cup? Who knows?

But what the hell does that have to do with who killed JFK? Nothing, unless you’re desperate to invent “evidence”.

You mean KGB informant (according to KGB true defector Pyotr Deriabin) Marina and Russophile Ruthie gave confusing, conflicting testimony?

Imagine that!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Why the first shot missed
« Reply #242 on: Today at 01:17:20 AM »