How to wipe down your weapon of choice real quick

[Bill Chapman]

When did the WC say any of that?

WCR Chapter 4 or 5, in the section where they described the McNeely/Randle thing.

[Bill Chapman]

Says the guy who pretends that he knows Euins meant receding hairline when he said bald spot.

Are you really this dense? She had McNeely hold his object to match what she saw, and then they measured it.

Point out where I said Euins meant receding hairline instead of bald spot.

You're rather slow: Randle estimated the size, ergo my crack about her not actually using a tape measure. They measured her estimation, Clouseau. Did McNeeley hold the package in a way that almost touched the ground, by any chance? This I gotta see.

[Bill Chapman]

But the WC said she was mistaken -- DOH

So was Frazier -- LOL

The WC would dismiss anything that didn't fit their fantasy.

They dismissed it based on the fact that the 27" length could have not have almost touched the ground. Too short.

[Bill Chapman]

You're totally lost, dude, they measure the length based on the "re-enactment".

Based on nothing but estimation & memory.

[Bill Chapman]

Who said it almost touched the ground?

You need to do either get off this thread or do some research.
Running your mouth here won't get you anywhere.

[Ray Mitcham]

Linnie Mae said that the bag had the top "sort of turned down".

"Mrs. RANDLE. Yes, sir; with that folded down with this much for him to grip in his hand."

Doesn't sound like Chapman's  description at all, and that certainly isn't the way Dan Rather's parcel is wrapped, as shown in post 117.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-PSV0f9EAOD4/VhHBB8UhOpI/AAAAAAAAl28/MTMU7MkDc2M/s640/Dan%2BRather.jpg

[John Iacoletti]

WCR Chapter 4 or 5, in the section where they described the McNeely/Randle thing.

Cool citation, Bro. They didn’t describe the “McNeely/Randle thing” in the WCR.

[John Iacoletti]

Based on nothing but estimation & memory.

But we’re supposed to prefer Chapman’s estimate based on no memory.