How to wipe down your weapon of choice real quick

[Ray Mitcham]

Not the bag by itself, professor.

NSS! How heavy can an empty bag be, professor?

And neither curtain rods nor a chicken w/Apple lunch qualify as being heavy

Bulky, baggy... whatever
Not that you're nitpicking..
Gd gaslighter

Not nitpicking at all. Just picking your arguments apart.

"“The replica was shortened by folding the open top down to reach the desired length. Then accordance with Mrs Randle’s observations, Special Agent MC Neely grasped the top this sack with his hand much like a right handed batter would pick up a baseball bat when approaching the plate. When the proper length of the sack was reached according to Mrs Randle’s estimate it was measured and found to be 27” long."

[Bill Chapman]

NSS! How heavy can an empty bag be, professor?
Not nitpicking at all. Just picking your arguments apart.

"“The replica was shortened by folding the open top down to reach the desired length. Then accordance with Mrs Randle’s observations, Special Agent MC Neely grasped the top this sack with his hand much like a right handed batter would pick up a baseball bat when approaching the plate. When the proper length of the sack was reached according to Mrs Randle’s estimate it was measured and found to be 27” long."

Just picking your arguments apart
>>> Well, there's some more CT bravado for you

Btw, just how wide is the gun/curtain-rod bag, anyway?

[Ray Mitcham]

Just picking your arguments apart
>>> Well, there's some more CT bravado for you

Btw, just how wide is the gun/curtain-rod bag, anyway?

As you said some time ago to John Iacoletti "If you have to ask that, you shouldn't be here"

[John Iacoletti]

It’s always “nitpicking” when Chapman gets stuff wrong. So she didn’t actually say “tapered toward the top” either, right?

[Bill Chapman]

As you said some time ago to John Iacoletti "If you have to ask that, you shouldn't be here"

LOL. Do you really think that the admin means that particular rule to apply to anything other than moral standards?

Making changes in another poster's blue box is not allowed here. It's a question of morality. You still don't understand that.

Btw, I know of several claimed sizes; for instance Don Roberdeau indicated 7.7" in his drawing. The sister of the guy who delivered the probable assassin to the (eventual) scene of the crime said something around 8". Said 'bro claimed something like 5.5". And I've seen claims hovering around 9.5"

Can I at least get a hint from you... am I getting warm? Are any of the claims in the ballpark? Or are they all out in left field..

EDIT:
Added comments
8:36pm EST

[John Iacoletti]

Making changes in another poster's blue box is not allowed here. It's a question of morality. You still don't understand that.

Who said that’s not allowed here? You?

Btw, I know of several claimed sizes; for instance Don Roberdeau indicated 7.7" in his drawing, the sister of the guy who delivered the probable assassin to the (eventual) scene of the crime said something around 8". Said 'bro claimed something like 5.5". I've seen claims hovering around 9.5"

“Probable assassin”. LOL.

[Bill Chapman]

Who said that’s not allowed here? You?

“Probable assassin”. LOL.

Try changing anything directly in my blue boxes and find out, heathen.

And what are you laughing at, Chuckles? Try telling us the width of the bag.

[Jerry Freeman]

 There is still the matter of no fingerprints produced on the spent cartridges.. On the clip.. On any live rounds in the clip..From shells supposedly recovered at the Tippit scene..and even prints on any bullets from this .38 revolver supposedly taken from the Texas Theater & no prints were processed from Tippit's squad car.
Did the Invisible Man wipe everything down?
Review...  https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,154.msg2738.html#msg2738