The Monster Plot, by CIA's Very Own KGB Apologist John L. Hart!

[Michael Clark]

Michael,.....

--  MWT 

PS  ..... I'll wait until I'm sure you're good-and-finished (like after two or three days of no "action" from you on this thread), and then I'll print out all 186 pages of Hart's report and highlight all of the sections that you've posted here, and I'll proceed to "rip you a new one," metaphorically speaking, point-by-point-by-point, by quoting to you pertinent rebuttals from Bagley's different writings and testimonies, okay?

Why would you wait? The game is on, now!  Unless of course the goal is to bury my posts under a 187 page wall of text, Gaalifed, with gobs of nonsense that you copy and paste from your years of pushing you paranoid false theory that was abandoned before I was even born, to the extent that any gentle reader will just keep walking on by...

[Thomas Graves]

Why would you wait? The game is on, now!  Unless of course the goal is to bury my posts under a 187 page wall of text, Gaalifed, with gobs of nonsense that you copy and paste from your years of pushing you paranoid false theory that was abandoned before I was even born, to the extent that any gentle reader will just keep walking on by...

No, Michael.

(Please don't get paranoiac and nasty, again.)

I'll do it in relatively short posts (hopefully), and point-by-point-by-point, with one post for each point (hopefully), okay?

Feel better now?

(This is gonna be fun!)

-- MWT   

[Michael Clark]

[Thomas Graves]

LOL

This is going to be so much fun!

You've got some more, right?

I'll wait until you've gotten them all up, Michael, and then take them on one-by-one and point out how each one of them was a burnt-out, throw-away "has-been" asset for the KGB because he was either 1) already suspected, 2) no longer actively working for the KGB/GRU, or 3) no longer had access to classified information.

I hope you don't mind some more fairly long posts in my doing so.

Cheers!

--  MWT   


PS  Shouldn't you try to convince John Newman and Peter Dale Scott that they made a really, really big mistake in concluding Nosenko was a false defector?

[Michael Clark]

LOL This is going to be so much fun! You've got some more, right? I'll wait until you've gotten them all up, Michael, and then take them on one-by-one and point out how each one of them was a burnt-out, throw-away "has-been" asset for the KGB because he was either 1) already suspected, 2) no longer actively working for the KGB/GRU, or 3) no longer had access to classified information. I hope you don't mind some more fairly long posts in my doing so.Cheers!--  MWT    PS  Shouldn't you try to convince John Newman and Peter Dale Scott that they made a really, really big mistake in concluding Nosenko was a false defector?

Why don’t you stop spamming the thread until you have something relevant to say? Quit asking the same stupid questions over and over again. I am not going to answer them.

[Michael Clark]

Professional opinions about Nosenko rendered without sufficient information.
For background, see p. 142

https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/104-10534-10205.pdf

[Michael Clark]

Editing

[Thomas Graves]

More from CIA Director of Security, Howard Osborne:

If any of this thread's 43 current guests are wondering where in the heck this "gem" came from, it's from page 140 of "spiteful and under-endowed" John L. Hart's so-called "Monster Plot" report which Hart undoubtedly wrote a long, long time ago, but which didn't become available to the public until 2017.

My nemesis on this forum, Michael Clark, posted the continuation (i.e., page 141) of Howard Osborn's (no "e") memo earlier in this thread, before he posted this one.  LOL

-- Mudd Wrassler Tommy