Going back to the scene of the crime, one of the first reporters reported that their was a "single shot followed by 2 shots in short succession". If he was right, there was an interlude and not possible for 3 shots to come from a bolt action rifle which would need even spacing to allow for reloading. Was his initial reporting to the anchor wrong? He certainly did not describe 3 evenly spaced shots!
If you were downwind of the shot, you could smell gunpowder if it came from the front of the car, not vice versa. The "man" rolling and tumbling across the grass while no one else reacts certainly is a red flag/herring as he appears to have momentum with his movement. Was this really Malcom Summers who was first interviewed in 1988? The man closest to the assassination? He had changed stories so much! Why no statement 25 years earlier? As well, AP cameraman Altgens can't seem to pull the trigger on his camera. It would be interesting to see his film to see if there was a missing frame in the negatives! The President's car started to speed up after the SS agent jumps on the back after trotting up from the backup car - very slow movement of vehicles in order to facilitate that move that can't be made up! Why was that?
There were 2 light anomalies present on the windshield in the Zapruder Film which could have been created by shattered glass. Again, the second prime witness sitting beside JFK that counted the most and watched the whole gruesome event never produced a statement for the investigation. This tells me that there is present an obstruction of justice and a massive coverup. Some at the hospital seemed to think there was a gunshot hole in the windshield as well. No one allowed near the car. The body of JFK whisked away at gunpoint defying Texas state law! Statements were made to cover the fact that some suspected a hole in the windshield. It was almost as if it was an after the fact paper move to cover up a rumor that was started! That is was there to tie up loose ends!
Certainly most witnesses thought the shots came from the grassy knoll as that was the initial stampede direction and where everyone was initially looking. Surely all these people didn't think the shots came from the TSBD building when they ran in that direction to see who fired the shots. Logic dictates there was sound emanating from the forward direction of the car.
Having a lack of investigation of the car at the time and having it whisked away back to Washington without any police investigation there, certainly raises another red flag. The only thing known later was that the windshield was changed and those reports were documented after the car was detained in a controlled environment. Just a fragment of a fragmented bullet wipes out the windshield? That should be recreated!
Another red flag was the magic bullet. As the document pointed out by Jerry Organ from Maryferrel.org, they could never duplicate a larger entrance wound than exit with Connally's wrist. Was it merely the angle of entrance versus angle of exit? A lack of answers to fundamental questions fuels the CTers and rightly so!
