Crease in SN box

[John Iacoletti]

There's no need for the desperate sarcasm, there were what appears to be hundreds of boxes on the 6th floor of the Depository and the chances of Oswald touching every box within the last three days is incredibly slim but out of all of those boxes he specifically touched the one that was angled down Elm street.

What does this have to do with your claim that he used this as a rifle rest? “Angled down Elm street” is just you begging the question. You don’t know how long those boxes were there.

In addition the prints were on top of the box which for a carrying purposes is a redundant surface.

Not for opening purposes.

[Walt Cakebread]

What does this have to do with your claim that he used this as a rifle rest? “Angled down Elm street” is just you begging the question. You don’t know how long those boxes were there.

Not for opening purposes.

This photo depicts the imaginary prints on the CORNERS of the top box of Rolling Readers....  Who in the world handles a box by the CORNERS???

[Thomas Graves]

You seem to have forgotten the basic scenario that the police used to convict Lee Oswald......  They said that he sat on the box to the rear and rested the Carcano on the stack of three Rolling Readers and declined the muzzle down onto Elm street in front of the TSBD and murdered President Kennedy......

They said he used the boxes as a rifle rest ......I'm here to tell you the feat was impossible......You must stick with the story they presented......

Walter,

Hey, everybody makes mistakes.

(Hell, even I made a mistake once.)

Analysis of the cartridge ejection pattern in the film The Lost Bullet strongly suggests that one shot was taken from a slightly different vertical position than the other two, and that none of them were taken by a person sitting on that box.

Deal with it, dude.

--  MWT 

[Walt Cakebread]

Walter,

Hey, everybody makes mistakes.

(Hell, even I made a mistake once.)

Analysis of the cartridge ejection pattern in the film The Lost Bullet strongly suggests that one shot was taken from a slightly different vertical position than the other two, and that none of them were taken by a person sitting on that box.

Deal with it, dude.


--  MWT 

none of them were taken by a person sitting on that box.

THAT'S The point I was trying to make....   Lee Oswald ( nor anybody else)  did NOT sit on a box and use the stack of Rolling Readers as a rifle rest....

But that is contrary to what the liars who framed Lee told the gullible public....

[Thomas Graves]

none of them were taken by a person sitting on that box.

THAT'S The point I was trying to make....   Lee Oswald ( nor anybody else)  did NOT sit on a box and use the stack of Rolling Readers as a rifle rest....

But that is contrary to what the liars who framed Lee told the gullible public....

Walter,

Maybe you don't "get" it.

Irrespective of the crease in the box and the positioning of a box the sniper probably sat on (but did not shoot from) while waiting for the motorcade to make its appearance at Main and Houston, the evidence indicates the the three shots were fired from that window.

-- MWT 

[Walt Cakebread]

Walter,

Maybe you don't "get" it.

Irrespective of the crease in the box and the positioning of a box the sniper probably sat on (but did not shoot from) while waiting for the motorcade to make its appearance at Main and Houston, the evidence indicates the the three shots were fired from that window.

-- MWT 

Thomas...  The  police "investigators" used the stack of boxes and the crease on the top box as evidence that supported their tale that Lee Oswald had used the stack of boxes to steady his deadly accurate rifle with a telescopic sight ( which was mounted askew).

The trusting, and gullible and grieving, public accepted the tale because they had no way of knowing that the act attributed to Lee Oswald was physically impossible, because the 5'9" Lee Oswald could not have sat on a box to the rear of the stack of Rolling Readers and placed the carcano on the stack of boxes and declined the muzzle down onto Elm street.    And the Carcano does not have anything on the bottom of the stock that would create a groove (scar) on the top of the box , nor is the carcano a heavy recoil rifle ( The recoil is probably less than one inch ...depending on the size and strength of the shooter)   I believe there is a youtube video of a man firing a carcano while holding it in one hand like a pistol)       

[Thomas Graves]

Thomas...  The  police "investigators" used the stack of boxes and the crease on the top box as evidence that supported their tale that Lee Oswald had used the stack of boxes to steady his deadly accurate rifle with a telescopic sight ( which was mounted askew).

The trusting, and gullible and grieving, public accepted the tale because they had no way of knowing that the act attributed to Lee Oswald was physically impossible, because the 5'9" Lee Oswald could not have sat on a box to the rear of the stack of Rolling Readers and placed the carcano on the stack of boxes and declined the muzzle down onto Elm street.    And the Carcano does not have anything on the bottom of the stock that would create a groove (scar) on the top of the box , nor is the carcano a heavy recoil rifle ( The recoil is probably less than one inch ...depending on the size and strength of the shooter)   I believe there is a youtube video of a man firing a carcano while holding it in one hand like a pistol)       

Dear Walter,

Are you saying that it was physically impossible for Oswald to have fired three shots at JFK from that window?

How the heck do you know the sniper didn't put a crease in that box with his or her hand before testing its practicality while sitting on that comfy, comfy box and realizing that it wasn't such a good idea, after all?

LOL

-- MWT 

[Walt Cakebread]

Dear Walter,

Are you saying that it was physically impossible for Oswald to have fired three shots at JFK from that window?

How the heck do you know the sniper didn't put a crease in that box with his or her hand before testing its practicality while sitting on that comfy, comfy box and realizing that it wasn't such a good idea, after all?

LOL

-- MWT 

Are you saying that it was physically impossible for Oswald to have fired three shots at JFK from that window?

Of course not!..... I'm clearly stating that it was impossible for any 5' 9" man to sit on a box and rest a rifle on the stack of Rolling Readers, and DECLINE the muzzle low enough to shoot JFK down on Elm street in front of the TSBD.

How the heck do you know the sniper didn't put a crease in that box with his or her hand before testing its practicality while sitting on that comfy, comfy box and realizing that it wasn't such a good idea, after all?

That's NOT what the cops said he did....They said that he rested the cacano on the stack of boxes and fired down onto Elm street and murdered President Kennedy.