Lance Payette speaks and How this would play out in court!

[Tom Scully]

If Duncan wants a certain look to forum formatting he can control to HTML tools more tightly, like Morley's forum. Frankly, Royell seems a little quirky (good for him) and probably can't stand convention.

"More tightly"? In my experience you are comparing apples to oranges.

I have used this forum's software on several of my own websites, in several editions, just as Duncan has.
I hope we can agree that he prefers it, as an off the shelf solution, for at least 8 years on this (jfkassassinationforum.com) site.:
https://download.simplemachines.org/

I have spent time, behind the curtain, on Morley's website. It is a lightly customized version of this.:
https://wordpress.org/download/

From my own hands on experience with both of those comments platforms, Morley's jfkfacts.org is not limited in
the constraint he prefers of comments features and options, but by the secondary nature of the comments module in the
design of the package. It is a blog format. Those with privileged access to create articles have even richer features
than anyone participating here have.

The comments module is bare bones and cannot be enhanced, except as I did with edit privileged access, when I was
comments editor, there.
Example: http://jfkfacts.org/who-was-the-only-man-to-ever-face-legal-charges-in-jfks-assassination/#comment-856847

No admin would grant that level to commenters, and that level is still bare bones, compared to the
forum software we enjoy here.:

[Walt Cakebread]

But when you get into the level of work that the FBI and Warren Commission did (some of which is truly mind-boggling), and then the review by the HSCA, you realize that the assassination DID receive a close look.  It may be the accepted conspiracy gospel that the Warren Report was a slipshod effort, but that is simply not true,  I have no problem if someone wants to keep looking, so long as it remains within the bounds of sanity.

Nothing related to the Klein's paperwork presented by the Commission was investigated.

This guy is an ignorant nut job.

This guy ( Lance Payette )is an ignorant nut job.

[Bill Chapman]

 

Storing didn't use any formatting tools, he just repeatedly pressed the spacebar and that you cannot combat.

They all have their quirks and methodology.

Caprio's "you have no evidence"
Weidmann's aggression
Capasse's BS images.
Ray's inability to understand anything image related.
Iacoletti all of the above. LOL
Storing's bizarre formatting AND ODD capitalization.
Ernie's BOLDING
Fratini and Crow ganging up on you.



JohnM

Each time I arrive on the forum main page, usually CTers are hogging all but one or two front page slots. And you'll notice that these characters are always slapping each other on the back. This, and the demand that we answer all their posts, and immediately... then claim we cannot when they get no response. That is confirmation neediness gone wild.

[Ray Mitcham]

 

Storing didn't use any formatting tools, he just repeatedly pressed the spacebar and that you cannot combat.

They all have their quirks and methodology.

Caprio's "you have no evidence"
Weidmann's aggression
Capasse's BS images.
Ray's inability to understand anything image related.
Iacoletti all of the above. LOL
Storing's bizarre formatting AND ODD capitalization.
Ernie's BOLDING
Fratini and Crow ganging up on you.



JohnM

It's unfortunate for you, that I'm here to show your disinformation, John. Carry on giving us a laugh.

[Colin Crow]

They all have their quirks and methodology.

Caprio's "you have no evidence"
Weidmann's aggression
Capasse's BS images.
Ray's inability to understand anything image related.
Iacoletti all of the above. LOL
Storing's bizarre formatting AND ODD capitalization.
Ernie's BOLDING
Fratini and Crow ganging up on you.



JohnM

Colin if you can't handle the heat get out of the kitchen.



JohnM

[Bill Chapman]

And when you don't have the facts, make up some stuff that isn't true and call it a fact.

Says the guy who claims that the shooter was crouched down behind boxes in the window so as to imply that Brennan couldn't possibly have seen the belt. Then ignores the fact that Brennan said he observed the same man prior to the arrival of the motorcade standing near the window and saw him from the hips/belt up.

And by the way, why would the shooter have to be 'crouched behind boxes' when all that was visible from the street was just the tip of one box.

Your need to sensationalize every little detail speaks volumes.

[Walt Cakebread]

Says the guy who claims that the shooter was crouched down behind boxes in the window so as to imply that Brennan couldn't possibly have seen the belt. Then ignores the fact that Brennan said he observed the same man prior to the arrival of the motorcade standing near the window and saw him from the hips/belt up.

And by the way, why would the shooter have to be 'crouched behind boxes' when all that was visible from the street was just the tip of one box.

Your need to sensationalize every little detail speaks volumes.

Brennan said he observed the same man prior to the arrival of the motorcade standing near the window and saw him from the hips/belt up.

Here are Brennan's words from his affidavit on 11/22/63.

Quote:..."Then the man let the gun down to his side and stepped down out of sight. He did not seem to be in any hurry.I could see this man from about his belt up"...unquote.

Brennan said that he saw the man standing and aiming a HUNTING rifle ( possibly a 30-30 Winchester) out of a sixth floor window and he could see this man from about his belt up. 

This was NOT before the motorcade arrived.....

[John Iacoletti]

Says the guy who claims that the shooter was crouched down behind boxes in the window so as to imply that Brennan couldn't possibly have seen the belt. Then ignores the fact that Brennan said he observed the same man prior to the arrival of the motorcade standing near the window and saw him from the hips/belt up.

Try again, Bill.  He said he could see him from the belt up at the time of the head shot.

And by the way, why would the shooter have to be 'crouched behind boxes' when all that was visible from the street was just the tip of one box.

How do you think the gunman was positioned for the head shot?

Your need to sensationalize every little detail speaks volumes.

I think you're talking about Brennan.  He wrote a 128 page book about a 6 second experience.