The "Domino Room Alibi"

[Thomas Graves]

Get your head out, and wipe your eyes, so you can see....

They supposedly had arrested Lee as a suspect in the Tippit murder.....  So why didn't they ask a single question about that event?   

Fritz says that he asked Lee Where he was when the president was shot.....  Do you believe that??

Lee Oswald was a trained intel agent.... Spies lie.....  That's what they are trained to do.    Dulles himself said that he would expect a agent to lie even in court under oath...So yes, Lee probably lied about some things ( like Mexico City)   

And there's absolutely NO DOUBT that the authorities ( DPD, FBI, and WC) lied about many things and created false evidence to frame the suspect...So I ask you ...In your opinion which is more despicable ....A suspect lying...Or the authorities lying....

"Walt",

How do you know these things?

Did Mark "Paid by the KGB to Debunk the Warren Report" Lane, or Oliver Stone, or Roger Stone, or James "Jumbo Duh" DiEugenio at the so-called Education Forum, or probable long-term KGB "illegal" George DeMohrenschildt, or Vladimir Putin, himself, tell you?

--  MWT 

[Walt Cakebread]

"Walt",

How do you know these things?

Did Mark "Paid by the KGB to Debunk the Warren Report" Lane, or Oliver Stone, or Roger Stone, or James "Jumbo Duh" DiEugenio at the so-called Education Forum, or probable long-term KGB "illegal" George DeMohrenschildt, or Vladimir Putin, himself, tell you?

--  MWT 

How do you know these things?

I've never suffered from cranial rectalitus .....( as you obviously do) ...I can see through smoke screens, and discern the truth, unhampered by political bias.

[Thomas Graves]

How do you know these things?

I've never suffered from cranial rectalitus .....( as you obviously do) ...I can see through smoke screens, and discern the truth, unhampered by political bias.

"Walt",

No need to "fact check"?

Got your own built-in "Bullspombleprofglidnoctobuns Meter" (like so many gullible Trump supporters claim to have), do you?

LOL

--  MWT 

[Martin Weidmann]

Get your head out, and wipe your eyes, so you can see....

They supposedly had arrested Lee as a suspect in the Tippit murder.....  So why didn't they ask a single question about that event?   

Fritz says that he asked Lee Where he was when the president was shot.....  Do you believe that??

Lee Oswald was a trained intel agent.... Spies lie.....  That's what they are trained to do.    Dulles himself said that he would expect a agent to lie even in court under oath...So yes, Lee probably lied about some things ( like Mexico City)   

And there's absolutely NO DOUBT that the authorities ( DPD, FBI, and WC) lied about many things and created false evidence to frame the suspect...So I ask you ...In your opinion which is more despicable ....A suspect lying...Or the authorities lying....

They supposedly had arrested Lee as a suspect in the Tippit murder.....  So why didn't they ask a single question about that event? 

That is indeed an interesting question. 

From the moment Oswald was brought into the station he was linked to the Kennedy murder and hardly any attention was paid to the Tippit murder for which he was arrested. Hmmm... an other conundrum added to the list.

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

"Walt",

How do you know these things?

Did Mark "Paid by the KGB to Debunk the Warren Report" Lane, or Oliver Stone, or Roger Stone, or James "Jumbo Duh" DiEugenio at the so-called Education Forum, or probable long-term KGB "illegal" George DeMohrenschildt, or Vladimir Putin, himself, tell you?

--  MWT 

You should love the KGB for one important reason, they don't talk as much as you do.
That will give you something to think about. I wonder how long it will be until you talk about it

[Thomas Graves]

You should love the KGB for one important reason, they don't talk as much as you do.
That will give you something to think about. I wonder how long it will be until you talk about it

Talk about what, Kleinschmidt?

About how ignorant you are?

That could take weeks, comrade.

--  MWT 

[Rick Plant]

Pat Speer went into great detail on this. He has found plenty of evidence to the contrary. No one here (crazy CTers and of course the Nutters) will of course bother reading the link below but if you really want to learn how it was virtually impossible for Oswald to have done what he was accused of doing in that very tight time frame and with so many people around, then read this very carefully.

http://www.patspeer.com/chapter4b%3A%22theso-calledevidence%22

Lance Payette seems like a nice guy. I gave him some advice when he traveled to DC a while back on a nice unknown site to see down there (the FDR memorial) and he said he enjoyed it afterward. But as for this case, Lance is nothing if not a walking contradiction. He claims to be a genius attorney who believes in no conspiracy anywhere, no UFOs (rightfully so) but also believes there is some higher up fairy out there controlling the universe with nothing more to believe in than "faith."

The problem with Lance is that for all of his so-called lawyerly prowess, he simply cannot shake it that things were a little too perfect, too pat, on 11/22. Any lawyer worth their salt - putting all of the other batspombleprofglidnoctobuns craziness of this case aside - would have found plenty of oddities in this case that go beyond mere coincidence.

Do you agree 100% with Speer?

[Martin Weidmann]

Well she first said she saw him near the front door on the first floor. This is the only way Oswald could have been anywhere near Junior and Norman. He couldn't have seen them if he was in the 2nd floor lunch room. So you need to make up your mind, was Arnold telling the truth the first time or the second time. That's not a great question to have to ask of someones credibility you're relying on, when there is more circumstantial evidence Oswald was on the 6th floor pulling the trigger.

Well she first said she saw him near the front door on the first floor.

Actually, you don't know what she really said. All you've got to go on are two FBI reports which Arnold never read or signed.
If I remember correctly, Oswald told his interrogators that he ate his lunch in the Domino room, on the first floor, and then went upstairs to get a soda in the 2nd floor lunchroom.

Junior and Norman passed through the shipping area (visible from the Domino room) anywhere between 12.20 and 12.25 and Carolyn Arnold, according to one FBI report saw Oswald at around 12.25 pm at the second floor lunchroom. There seems to be no discrepancy there.

The problem with all this is of course that Oswald never had an opportunity to show the investigators in an reenactment where he was exactly and what he saw there, so that it could be matched up and verified with what witnesses like Junior, Norman and Arnold were saying. As it stands all we have are conflicting reports from the interrogators which, because of the contradictions, are being dismissed as Oswald's lies, when in fact those contradictions could simply have been the result of a misunderstanding or a consequence of the interrogators not knowing the lay out of the TSBD. Had the interrogators been familiar with that lay out they would have known that you can't walk through the Domino room as it only has one entrance. All we are left with are some notes from the interrogators with nobody taking the trouble to ask follow up questions for clarification. It is by no means a perfect record!

when there is more circumstantial evidence Oswald was on the 6th floor pulling the trigger.

What circumstantial evidence, except for wishful thinking, is there that Oswald was on the 6th floor at 12.30?