Those Front Steps

[John Mytton]

"a tiny sliver of shadow", lol

Thanks for the higher res graphic.
1, The shadow is not Jet Black.
2. The shadow line is not a curtain.
3. The shadow naturally follows Lovelady's shirt.
4. The detail and associated highlighting in the entire shadow is consistent with Lovelady's shadow.
5. The level of artistry on display in the photo realistic Lovelady shadow is really a sight to behold and to think they did this not once but a dozen times with jerky, motion blurred, hand held film? Far out man, far out!



JohnM

[John Mytton]

Of course You "stop reading".

Yes, and again I stopped reading after the initial few words, don't take it too hard but your opinion really is worthless.

JohnM

[Ray Mitcham]

(~Sigh~) Your altered version of Mr Speer's photograph, Mr Mitcham, added fake shadow to the real shadow, because you need some makey-uppey shadow to make your placement of Mr Lovelady way over towards the west wall a little less ridiculous.

That clear enough for you?

 

The right hand line of the shadow exactly follows the right hand line in the original photo.
Please point out where I added fake shadow ..outside (i.e to the right of) the line of the shadow of the west Column.

P.U.O.S U

[Chris Davidson]

James H,
What is the distance from the west wall to where the shadow intersects the landing?
Thank you,
Chris


 

[Royell Storing]

Thanks for the higher res graphic.
1, The shadow is not Jet Black.
2. The shadow line is not a curtain.
3. The shadow naturally follows Lovelady's shirt.
4. The detail and associated highlighting in the entire shadow is consistent with Lovelady's shadow.
5. The level of artistry on display in the photo realistic Lovelady shadow is really a sight to behold and to think they did this not once but a dozen times with jerky, motion blurred, hand held film? Far out man, far out!



JohnM

     (1) You claim we are Not seeing a Curtain, and then manage to enclose it inside a Box. Thank you. (2) You claim the Curtain is Not Jet Black. What in that pic is darker than this Jet Black Curtain? Thanks again.

[Tim Nickerson]

Happy to, Mr Nickerson!

Mr Lee Harvey Oswald was standing just behind Mr Billy Lovelady at the time of the assassination:



 

WOW! There he is. Our man Oswald. Smirk and all. You da man Al. 

[Alan Ford]

No worries, I have already stated on numerous occasions that the landing is deeper today

 

Here's what actually happened, Mr Mytton. It's a real hoot!

1. I posted this photo from Mr Pat Speer:



2. You, rubbing your hands in glee as you saw the shadow reaching almost the perfect midpoint of the doorway, posted this claim that all my claims were refuted by what you had noticed:



3. I gently pointed out to you that the landing depth today is different to the landing depth in 1963, and you came back with this:





So the landing was "a little deeper", "a bit deeper (from memory a couple of feet) in 2019", was it?

Let's look at the facts, shall we? 

Depth of landing in 1963: less than 4 feet



(Credit: Mr Gary Murr!  )

Depth of landing now: 9 feet.



The landing has been extended to well over twice its original depth!

This is what you call "a little deeper"!

Keep up the good work, Mr Mytton! 

[Alan Ford]

The right hand line of the shadow exactly follows the right hand line in the original photo.
Please point out where I added fake shadow ..outside (i.e to the right of) the line of the shadow of the west Column.

P.U.O.S U

Kindly stop with this nonsense, Mr Mitcham!