Those Front Steps

[Alan Ford]

      The supporting evidence I mentioned above would support a possible Frazier confirmation of Oswald being in front of the TSBD when the JFK Limo passed by. Sounds like You are afraid of what Frazier would say. Your fear is justified. The Black Curtain is worthy of discussion. Your wanting to place Oswald behind this Black Curtain has No merit. In fact, grouping Oswald with the Curtain damages the credibility of your Black Curtain.

 

Mr Royell Storing A: Any position/belief supported via the ever changing  distributed by Frazier = an immediate Disqualifier.

Mr Royell Storing B: Your theory has no merit because Frazier doesn't confirm it.

Have the Courage and Character to Stand Alone, Mr Storing. There ain't room for two of you here!

[Royell Storing]

Mr Royell Storing A: Any position/belief supported via the ever changing  distributed by Frazier = an immediate Disqualifier.

Mr Royell Storing B: Your theory has no merit because Frazier doesn't confirm it.

Have the Courage and Character to Stand Alone, Mr Storing. There ain't room for two of you here!

     You can Not get around the Fact that Not 1 single Eyewitness standing in front of the TSBD has EVER said they saw Oswald there when the JFK Limo went by. Not One. Plus, Not 1 single Image shows Oswald to be in that position. Not One. The ONLY thing putting Oswald in that position is Oswald himself via the Hosty Notes.  You do see how ridiculous your position is?

[Alan Ford]

     You can Not get around the Fact that Not 1 single Eyewitness standing in front of the TSBD has EVER said they saw Oswald there when the JFK Limo went by. Not One. Plus, Not 1 single Image shows Oswald to be in that position. Not One. The ONLY thing putting Oswald in that position is Oswald himself via the Hosty Notes.  You do see how ridiculous your position is?

 

Did you go out for a beer with Mr Frazier at some point after 11 October, Mr Storing, and did he charm the cotton socks off you? Something must have happened to make you do this preposterous 180...

Mr Royell Storing A: Any position/belief supported via the ever changing  distributed by Frazier = an immediate Disqualifier.

Mr Royell Storing B: I will consider your theory to have no merit until Frazier confirms it.

Stop making a clown of yourself! 

[Jerry Freeman]

     You can Not get around the Fact that Not 1 single Eyewitness standing in front of the TSBD has EVER said they saw Oswald there when the JFK Limo went by. Not One. Plus, Not 1 single Image shows Oswald to be in that position. Not One. The ONLY thing putting Oswald in that position is Oswald himself via the Hosty Notes.  You do see how ridiculous your position is?

According to the notes taken by Fritz/others... indicates that Oswald just might have gone out "eating lunch in front with Shelley" as stated.
How would he know that for some reason he needed to say this? Also...understand that no one was going to stick up for the communist...no one.

[Alan Ford]

According to the notes taken by Fritz/others... indicates that Oswald just might have gone out "eating lunch in front with Shelley" as stated.
How would he know that for some reason he needed to say this? Also...understand that no one was going to stick up for the communist...no one.

 

And if the communist should happen to show up on film in the wrong place, this will happen:



Still waiting for those who argue that this magic shadow down Mr Lovelady's right side has nothing to do with Mr Oswald's presence to present a counter-explanation.*

*Please note: Counter-explanations that break the laws of physics will not be considered! 

[Royell Storing]

  Any relevant living eyewitness should be questioned when New Evidence such as the Hosty Notes is discovered. Anyone running away from this is Not serious about uncovering the truth.

[Alan Ford]

  Any relevant living eyewitness should be questioned when New Evidence such as the Hosty Notes is discovered. Anyone running away from this is Not serious about uncovering the truth.

But you repeatedly said-------------long after the Hosty Notes were discovered--------------that there was no point in listening to anything Mr Frazier had to say as he was a BS-merchant. Now, when you can't explain away the evidence I am presenting for Mr Oswald out front, Mr Frazier is suddenly promoted by you to The Key Witness Who Needs To Be Questioned! 

You have destroyed your own credibility here, Mr Storing. Your constant, and shameless, moving of the goalposts makes it clear: there are no circumstances under which you would ever accept that Mr Oswald was out front. On this issue at least, your logic is LNer logic--------i.e. no logic at all!

Most curious behavior...

[Royell Storing]

But you repeatedly said-------------long after the Hosty Notes were discovered--------------that there was no point in listening to anything Mr Frazier had to say as he was a BS-merchant. Now, when you can't explain away the evidence I am presenting for Mr Oswald out front, Mr Frazier is suddenly promoted by you to The Key Witness Who Needs To Be Questioned! 

You have destroyed your own credibility here, Mr Storing. Your constant, and shameless, moving of the goalposts makes it clear: there are no circumstances under which you would ever accept that Mr Oswald was out front. On this issue at least, your logic is LNer logic--------i.e. no logic at all!

Most curious behavior...

         You should at least be willing to listen to what one of the few living eyewitnesses has to say. You can discount or approve Frazier's story after hearing it. You have done some very good research. Your Now running away from a living eyewitnesses stains that fine work.  Instead of exploring every possible avenue of information, You choose to stick your fingers in your ears. This not only looks dumb but it also reveals your motivation is Not Truth based. Sad. Very Sad