Nitpicky Question About The Bag

[Walt Cakebread]

Notice how nutters can’t discuss any evidence without injecting propaganda like “Killer Oswald” or “Dirty Harvey” or “Oswald’s rifle” into the discussion as if it was just a given?

John, Don't you understand that these guys lack the guts to face reality, and they thrive on the BS that they believe is reality.

The Government ( LBJ's administration ) presented a fairy tale (the WR) for the simple minded piss ants ( the name LBJ used to refer to the working class)  and some folks like Mr Graves, Chapman, Brown, and many others, accepted that fairy tale, and they simply lack the guts to accept the bitter truth. 

[Thomas Graves]

John, Don't you understand that these guys lack the guts to face reality, and they thrive on the BS that they believe is reality.

The Government ( LBJ's administration ) presented a fairy tale (the WR) for the simple minded piss ants ( the name LBJ used to refer to the working class)  and some folks like Mr Graves, Chapman, Brown, and many others, accepted that fairy tale, and they simply lack the guts to accept the bitter truth.

You nailed it, Walter.

LOL

--  MWT 

[Jack Trojan]

Was the paper (or the finished bag, itself) ever folded in such a way as to make it easier for Oswald to put it under his belt or in his pocket, etc, to smuggle out of the building?

If not, wouldn't it suggest that the evil, evil, evil CIA or Dallas Police or somebody planted that bag in the sniper's nest?

But wait a second, if they smuggled it in, wouldn't they have had to fold it up?

(It was determined that that paper was from the TSBD, right?)

--  MWT 

PS  I know!  It was Roy Truly or Jack Dougherty!

Oswald had 4" of bag to fold over the 34" disassembled rifle, with the useless scope. Why aren't you asking yourself how Oswald managed to dissemble the rifle, place it into the bag, smuggle it into the TSBD, re-assemble it in the SN, fire it 3 times (bypassing the useless scope), ditch it behind some boxes, without leaving a single print on the rifle. Tell me how that was possible before you drone on about how the evil evil CIA folded the paper sack.

[Thomas Graves]

Oswald had 4" of bag to fold over the 34" disassembled rifle, with the useless scope. Why aren't you asking yourself how Oswald managed to dissemble the rifle, place it into the bag, smuggle it into the TSBD, re-assemble it in the SN, fire it 3 times (bypassing the useless scope), ditch it behind some boxes, without leaving a single print on the rifle. Tell me how that was possible before you drone on about how the evil evil CIA folded the paper sack.

The rough wood of the stock wouldn't "take" a print very well, and he could have wiped down the metal parts with his other shirt before putting it back on.

Anyway, a palm print of his was found on the rifle.

http://22november1963.org.uk/oswald-fingerprintpalmprint-evidence

--  MWT 

[John Iacoletti]

Anyway, a palm print of his was found on the rifle.

No, a partial palmprint showed up a week later on an index card.

[Thomas Graves]

No, a partial palmprint showed up a week later on an index card.

John,

Are you a Conspiracy Theorist, or just an over-the-top Oswald defender?

--  MWT 

[Martin Weidmann]

John,

Are you a Conspiracy Theorist, or just an over-the-top Oswald defender?

--  MWT 

Or just a realist who is correct....

[Thomas Graves]

Or just a realist who is correct....

Marty,

Oh yeah?

Correct about what?

That Oswald was "innocent, innocent, innocent, innocent, innocent, innocent, innocent!" ?

LOL

--  MWT