Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: A Better Sequence (TM DVP)  (Read 68600 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: A Better Sequence (TM DVP)
« Reply #336 on: November 15, 2019, 03:12:48 PM »
Advertisement
No you miss quoted him and are trying to characterizing him as talking about a Thirty aught six. You missed the "odd size." Do you have a thirty odd size six too?

Go to any sporting goods store and tell them you want to buy a thirty odd size six rifle and thirty odd size six ammunition. When they stop laughing they most likely will escort you out before you harm yourself or others.

Your ego is allowing your ignorance to make an utter fool of yourself....

I'd wager that if I went to a sporting goods store, or gun shop, and told them that I was interested in buying " a thirty odd size six rifle and thirty odd size six ammunition".  They would probably say ...Oh, You mean a Thirty Aught Six rifle?..... What brand do you have in mind.....We have that caliber in Remington, Winchester, and Mossberg..... 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A Better Sequence (TM DVP)
« Reply #336 on: November 15, 2019, 03:12:48 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: A Better Sequence (TM DVP)
« Reply #337 on: November 15, 2019, 04:14:24 PM »
No he went into great detail about the rifle.
--------------------------------

Yes. One starts with a B and the other with an M. What do you think is the difference?

You do know the difference between a Big game hunting rifle and a military rifle like a Mannlicher Carcano Don't you?....

--------------------------------

Yes. One starts with a B and the other with an M.

Thank you....  I believe you've got it....LOL!


Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: A Better Sequence (TM DVP)
« Reply #338 on: November 15, 2019, 09:32:17 PM »
It became a pattern with Rowland, how he would start a story and then embelish it. There is no way to judge a persons testimonies other than by what is stated. He went into great detail about the man with a rifle and his description of him framed in the window. It proved to be wrong.

What exactly proved it to be wrong?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A Better Sequence (TM DVP)
« Reply #338 on: November 15, 2019, 09:32:17 PM »


Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: A Better Sequence (TM DVP)
« Reply #339 on: November 15, 2019, 09:34:45 PM »
Ultimately Rowland claimed there was two people in the SN. Of course the WC investigators were going to react and investigate him and his claim.

Rowland wasn’t the only one who claimed to see two people there. It’s not at all a bizarre claim.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: A Better Sequence (TM DVP)
« Reply #340 on: November 15, 2019, 09:37:15 PM »
Rowland proved he had no idea and Brennan said he was no expert.

Again, what difference does it make with regard to the people he saw?

Brennan embellished the hell out of his story as time went on. Do you then disregard everything he reported?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A Better Sequence (TM DVP)
« Reply #340 on: November 15, 2019, 09:37:15 PM »


Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10876
Re: A Better Sequence (TM DVP)
« Reply #341 on: November 15, 2019, 09:38:58 PM »
I'd wager that if I went to a sporting goods store, or gun shop, and told them that I was interested in buying " a thirty odd size six rifle and thirty odd size six ammunition".  They would probably say ...Oh, You mean a Thirty Aught Six rifle?..... What brand do you have in mind.....We have that caliber in Remington, Winchester, and Mossberg.....

 Thumb1:

Businesses that mock their customers don’t tend to stay in business.

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: A Better Sequence (TM DVP)
« Reply #342 on: November 15, 2019, 09:56:26 PM »
It became a pattern with Rowland, how he would start a story and then embelish it. There is no way to judge a persons testimonies other than by what is stated. He went into great detail about the man with a rifle and his description of him framed in the window. It proved to be wrong.
------------------------------

It shows you Brennan was not an expert nor claimed to be knowledgeable.

Mr. BRENNAN. I am not an expert on guns. It was, as I could observe, some type of a high-powered rifle.

Now contrast that to Rowland.

Mr. SPECTER - How did you know that?
Mr. ROWLAND - I have been around guns quite a bit in my lifetime.

By Arnold's own statements he proves that was not true.
--------------------------------
Marina? In Russia they were not allowed to own a gun other than a shotgun. Oswald hunted with a shotgun in Russia. Given her upbringing she would have no way of knowing.


Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: A Better Sequence (TM DVP)
« Reply #343 on: November 15, 2019, 09:58:26 PM »
Special Treatment? Rowland threw the investigation into the realm of conspiracy by making a claim that he had never made before. He forced them to pursue the truth about his claim.

Ultimately Rowland claimed there was two people in the SN. Of course the WC investigators were going to react and investigate him and his claim. His WC testimony was erratic at best. The WC members obviously would have noted his multiple answers to the same question. Nothing in his testimony would lead you to believe he was a credible witness. The WC members saw and heard it first hand.

Can you post where he claimed that there were two people in the SN?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: A Better Sequence (TM DVP)
« Reply #343 on: November 15, 2019, 09:58:26 PM »