We all rely on book authors, film producers, and other notable presenters, such as journalists. I have written recently in another thread of my observations of
how thinned skinned these "expert" sources are predictably conducting themselves. They appreciate your purchase of their product but not enough not to act indifferent if you inform them they have mislead you, intentionally or not.
Please post descriptions of errors by LIVING sources (Bugliosi, for example, is beyond correcting, at this late date.) accompanied by evidence/facts supporting your
discovery and or opinion.
Oliver Stone has described his film, "JFK" as a docudrama....it employs literary license. Unless you have evidence to present countering a core premise presented in his film, please do not bog down this thread with challenges to story telling devices in that film, such as Mr. X or whatever character it was that actor Donald Sutherland portrayed in Stone's film.
If your interest in JFK Assassination related matters does not begin and end with what is true vs what is not, why even bother? Make your posts easier on the eyes by providing as close to primary supporting sources as possible. Let's send these content providers a message!
