Iacoletti asked....How does it’s being altered tell you anything about when the first one was written?
Let's get the two lists posted so everybody can see what's being discussed....
I'm not sure how the list having been altered is supposed to demonstrate that the "original" list is even an original list,Yes, that seems to be apparent.....
Even a ten year old would understand that the DPD would not have released a single piece of evidence unless they documented the fact that they released it to the FBI. Surely you won't argue that point, will you john?
So they must have documented the evidence (and many of the police officers and the FBI acknowledged that the DPD did in fact turn the evidence over to them at midnight 11/22/63.) They photographed and listed the evidence.... But they didn't know some of the information that appeared on the list for 11/26/63 so naturally that info was not listed on the original list. Is this too difficult for you Johnny?
I'm not sure how the list having been altered is supposed to demonstrate that the "original" list is even an original list,When placing the two documents ( Evidence list "A" and Evidence list "B" )side by side it's very obvious that the document that is printed on page 260 of Vol 24, which is Document "B" is a photo copy of Document "A".