3 x 5 Index Card that is item # 14 On the List

[Walt Cakebread]

Except he didn’t. Therefore that undated list does not describe the evidence that was released on 11/22.

Bull.

Thank you....You've just admitted that if item #14 on the list ( The unaltered original ) described the evidence released then Drain would have received the "partial palmprint"

Except he didn’t. Therefore that undated list does not describe the evidence that was released on 11/22.

Huh???what kinda cockeyed logic is this??   Drain denied receiving the so called palmprint on 11/22 /63 and since he denied that he received the 3 X 5 index card with the print lift on it , that negates the DESCRIPTION of item #14 on the evidence list???

[John Iacoletti]

Why do you present the testimony from the Warren Commission? 

Because your completely made up story about when Latona got the magic palmprint has no evidence to support it.

This listing of just TWO spent shells alone, and by itself, indicates that this document ( evidence inventory list) was created at a time when there were only TWO spent shells in evidence.....  And that time was the evening of 11 / 22/ 63.

Nope. Fritz didn’t hand over the alleged third shell until 11/27.

[John Iacoletti]

Huh???what kinda cockeyed logic is this??   Drain denied receiving the so called palmprint on 11/22 /63 and since he denied that he received the 3 X 5 index card with the print lift on it , that negates the DESCRIPTION of item #14 on the evidence list???

It doesn’t negate it, but it tells you that this list did not accompany the evidence handed over on 11/22, because the magic partial palmprint wasn’t handed over then (if it even existed then).

[Walt Cakebread]

It doesn’t negate it, but it tells you that this list did not accompany the evidence handed over on 11/22, because the magic partial palmprint wasn’t handed over then (if it even existed then).

This listing of just TWO spent shells alone, and by itself, indicates that this document ( evidence inventory list) was created at a time when there were only TWO spent shells in evidence.....  And that time was the evening of 11 / 22/ 63.

Nope. Fritz didn’t hand over the alleged third shell until 11/27.

John....On the evening of 11 / 22 /63 ...The DPD claimed that they had only TWO spent shells......  And that's what they released to the FBI.   Item # 9 on the evidence list ( The original , Document "A" ) says quote.... " 6.5 spent rounds (2) "    ... unquote.

How can you deny what is typed right there on the list that also includes the partial palm print..."off underside of gun barrel near end of foregrip  c 2766" 

[Jack Trojan]

This listing of just TWO spent shells alone, and by itself, indicates that this document ( evidence inventory list) was created at a time when there were only TWO spent shells in evidence.....  And that time was the evening of 11 / 22/ 63.

Nope. Fritz didn’t hand over the alleged third shell until 11/27.

John....On the evening of 11 / 22 /63 ...The DPD claimed that they had only TWO spent shells......  And that's what they released to the FBI.   Item # 9 on the evidence list ( The original , Document "A" ) says quote.... " 6.5 spent rounds (2) "    ... unquote.

How can you deny what is typed right there on the list that also includes the partial palm print..."off underside of gun barrel near end of foregrip  c 2766"

Walt you are wasting everyone's time here. If you suspect the DPD, SS, FBI, CIA and WH were in on the conspiracy then you have to chuck out everything on record that comes from them, especially when it`s not dated. That 3x5" card was a fraud. So why do you defend its authenticity? If the conspirators control the narrative then you cannot take anything they claim on face value. So why do you?

[Walt Cakebread]

Walt you are wasting everyone's time here. If you suspect the DPD, SS, FBI, CIA and WH were in on the conspiracy then you have to chuck out everything on record that comes from them, especially when it`s not dated. That 3x5" card was a fraud. So why do you defend its authenticity? If the conspirators control the narrative then you cannot take anything they claim on face value. So why do you?

If you suspect the DPD, SS, FBI, CIA and WH were in on the conspiracy then you have to chuck out everything on record that comes from them,

Yes that's true....  And especially the crap that the Warren Commission dumped on us.   

If I'm wasting your time just ignore my posts....

The 3 X 5 card was listed on the original evidence inventory list.... That 3 X 5 card was created by Lt Day in the TSBD that afternoon when Day discovered the smudge that he imagined might be a palm print.  He realized that the wood of the foregrip would absorb the print rapidly so he decided to lift it with cellophane tape.  Tom Alyea watched him as he lifted the smudge and placed the tape on a 3 X 5 white card , and then scrawled the pertinent information on that 3 X 5 card....Day scrawled.... "off underside of gun barrel near end of foregrip  c2766"  ... He also dated the card 11/22/63  and signed his name JC Day.

[Jack Trojan]

If you suspect the DPD, SS, FBI, CIA and WH were in on the conspiracy then you have to chuck out everything on record that comes from them,

Yes that's true....  And especially the crap that the Warren Commission dumped on us.   

If I'm wasting your time just ignore my posts....

The 3 X 5 card was listed on the original evidence inventory list.... That 3 X 5 card was created by Lt Day in the TSBD that afternoon when Day discovered the smudge that he imagined might be a palm print.  He realized that the wood of the foregrip would absorb the print rapidly so he decided to lift it with cellophane tape.  Tom Alyea watched him as he lifted the smudge and placed the tape on a 3 X 5 white card , and then scrawled the pertinent information on that 3 X 5 card....Day scrawled.... "off underside of gun barrel near end of foregrip  c2766"  ... He also dated the card 11/22/63  and signed his name JC Day.

Paul Groody, the mortician who received Oswald's body after his autopsy, claimed that in the early morning of Monday, November 25th, "agents" visited his funeral home and asked to be alone with Oswald's body. After they left, he had to remove fingerprint ink from Oswald's fingers and hands. That was 3 days after Day dated the card. I assume they already had Oswald's prints on file so what were they doing lifting prints from a dead body? Where are those prints, who do you believe and why?

[Walt Cakebread]

Paul Groody, the mortician who received Oswald's body after his autopsy, claimed that in the early morning of Monday, November 25th, "agents" visited his funeral home and asked to be alone with Oswald's body. After they left, he had to remove fingerprint ink from Oswald's fingers and hands. That was 3 days after Day dated the card. I assume they already had Oswald's prints on file so what were they doing lifting prints from a dead body? Where are those prints, who do you believe and why?

I don't give a RA what somebody said.....  I can SEE the evidence with my own eyes.... Get your head out and perhaps you also will see for yourself. 

The Palm print ( smudge) was discovered by Lt Day shortly after he pulled the rifle from beneath the wooden pallet.   Tom Alyea saw him lift what he imagined to be a palm print and place the lift on the 3 X 5 card.  That card is on the evidence inventory list for the evening of 11 /22 63.