Tippit Shooting, 1:15

[John Mytton]

Sure they do, depending on traffic..... So, what is your point?

In the past, Bill Brown argued that a time stamp card from the funeral home at Jefferson showed that the call was received at 1:18.
Now he seems to go with 1:18 as the time Tippit arrived at the hospital, 1,5 miles away....

Sure they do, depending on traffic..... So, what is your point?

Yep, in the middle of the day in the suburbs, there's always a lot of traffic!

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Correct, the autopsy permit, not the death certificate... but where does it say what you claimed it says, that Tippit "was DOA at the hospital at 1:15"?  I think you're wrong.

"Place of death: DOA Methodist Hospital"
"Date and time of death: 1:15 PM, November 22, 1963"

The actual death certificate says that he died at 1:15, but his injury occurred at 1:18.  Go figure...

[John Mytton]

You can claim that they all saw the same man, but you have no basis for that claim.

Not only did they all see the same man, in fair line-ups they all identified Lee Harvey Oswald as that man.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Not only did they all see the same man,

Still no basis for this claim.

in fair line-ups they all identified Lee Harvey Oswald as that man.

"fair line-ups".  LOL.

[John Mytton]

Still no basis for this claim.

That's a bizarre way to analyse the corroborated testimony but no worries, everyone's entitled to an opinion.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

That's a bizarre way to analyse the corroborated testimony but no worries, everyone's entitled to an opinion.

There is no testimony that says that they all saw the same person.  In fact, they all gave different descriptions.

[Martin Weidmann]

Yep, in the middle of the day in the suburbs, there's always a lot of traffic!

JohnM

I take it this means you have no point.

[John Mytton]

I take it this means you have no point.

Huh?, we're discussing your comparison of the speed of a car in 2019 to the speed of an Ambulance in 1963 and beyond your alluding to an unknown suburban lunchtime traffic jam, you're still no closer to proving your initial assumption. Try again.

JohnM