Martin, Do you really believe that those who have the ability to reason, can't see for themselves, that these guys are dishonest and will never ever stop lying?...
P.S Martin there are only a few members of this forum that I respect..... Those are the few who can see the truth ( thattThe authorities framed and lynched Lee Oswald) And you are high on my list. However I'm disappointed that you can't seem to understand the lie the authorities created about finding Lee Oswald's palm print. For me it's as obvious as an Elephant in a VW...... So I can't understand why you can't see the BS ruse that the FBI and the DPD created so they could confirm the Key conspirator's ( Henry Wade )lie about finding quote... "his prints on the gun"
Lee Oswald's prints have never been found on the carcano....But Henry Wades lie was instrumental in duping the dumb pissants (LBJ's name for us citizens)
and leading them to believe that Lee was guilty of murdering JFK.
Walt,
However I'm disappointed that you can't seem to understand the lie the authorities created about finding Lee Oswald's palm print. For me it's as obvious as an Elephant in a VW...... It's not so much that I don't understand your argument. I also understand the counter argument and quite honestly I simply do not have enough information to make a well balanced, objective and factual determination either way. I try to only have opinions about things I know enough about. That's why I stayed clear of the conversation after asking the questions I wanted answers for.
Lee Oswald's prints have never been found on the carcano The FBI did indeed not find any prints on the rifle on 11/23/63. They could not even find a trace of a print having been lifted from the rifle, which, in mind, calls into question the tale Day came up with.
But Henry Wades lie was instrumental in duping the dumb pissants (LBJ's name for us citizens) and leading them to believe that Lee was guilty of murdering JFK.Actually, I'm not so sure about that. Wade's lie (that prints belonging to Oswald had been found on the rifle, when they weren't) is just one of many false and incorrect statements made by law enforcement officials in the first days. I don't think any particular falsehood or error would have been decisive in convicting Oswald in the court of public opinion.
Can we now please return to the topic of this thread; being "Tippit's shooting 1:15"?