In that case he should have taken Tippit's revolver with him to make sure that a bystander couldn't pick it up and shoot at him.Just putting myself in Oswald's shoes...
Wake up Mr "Smith"..... Most of us have been onto you since you first started posting in this group. Anytime solid facts appear, that refute the official tale, you jump in and attack the messenger. Which rule is that in your rule book?..... Rule#?... If you can't refute the facts, then attack the messenger and try to make he or she appear to be a "kook".....
I didn't refute any "facts" because none are present in your claim that Oswald would not have finished Tippit off. Instead you substituted your own opinion of what Oswald would have done in that situation to reach a desired outcome. I merely provided one possible reason that Oswald finished Tippit off. I have no idea if that is why he did so because only Oswald could ever know for sure (a point you fail to realize) but it is plausible and counters your silly claim that Oswald would not have paused for even a moment to finish Tippit off. Thereby, somehow rendering him innocent of this crime despite the testimony of several witnesses that place him at the scene with a pistol. In addition, there is nothing that I or anyone else needs to do to make you appear to be a kook. You are adept at that yourself.
You are forever confusing your baseless subjective opinion with realityDid you look in a mirror, Smith?
My guess is that he was just trying to make sure that Tippit was not going to recover and identify him later on. Picking up Tippit’s gun would have potentially incriminated him (in case he got caught with it, or left a finger print on it).
Someone named Roger.
Maybe Oswald didn't want to get shot in the back by a wounded police officer as he left. So he finished him off. There was no one else around to arrest him. It only took an instant to finish him off. No great loss of time in fleeing from the scene.
