Tippit Shooting, 1:15

[Charles Collins]

You have never explained how Tippit's Killer removed  ONE- SHELL - AT-A-TIME as he walked away from the murder scene.....The most logical explanation is: The killer was NOT using a S&W revolver. 

As far as I know....Nobody has ever proved that the spent shells entered into evidence are in fact the same shells that were found at the murder scene....

Lee Harvey Oswald was carrying a re-chambered Victory Model when he was apprehended on November 22, 1963.

Maybe, or maybe not....  Can you prove that Lee was in possession of the S&W Victory when he was arrested in the Texas Theater.  And  yes,  I know that is a commonly accepted factoid.... But is it true?     If Lee had that S&W on him at the theater it certainly should have his prints all over it.    Were his prints found on the revolver?

You have never explained how Tippit's Killer removed  ONE- SHELL - AT-A-TIME as he walked away from the murder scene.....The most logical explanation is: The killer was NOT using a S&W revolver. 

Maybe you should explain this "logic" of yours.

A very reasonable explanation is that he could have pressed the ejector part way (so that the spent shells were part way out but still held there by friction. Then proceed to pull them out the rest of the way one at a time with his fingers.

[John Iacoletti]

Maybe, or maybe not....  Can you prove that Lee was in possession of the S&W Victory when he was arrested in the Texas Theater.

Even by the police account, he was not carrying a weapon when he was arrested (after the scuffle).

[Charles Collins]

Even by the police account, he was not carrying a weapon when he was arrested (after the scuffle).

It had just been taken away from him during the scuffle by the DPD.

[John Iacoletti]

It had just been taken away from him during the scuffle by the DPD.

That's what Nick McDonald claimed, yes.  Nick McDonald claimed a lot of things.

[Charles Collins]

That's what Nick McDonald claimed, yes.  Nick McDonald claimed a lot of things.

Rumor has it that you were on the jury for the O.J. Simpson murder trial. Is that true?

[Walt Cakebread]

You have never explained how Tippit's Killer removed  ONE- SHELL - AT-A-TIME as he walked away from the murder scene.....The most logical explanation is: The killer was NOT using a S&W revolver. 

Maybe you should explain this "logic" of yours.

A very reasonable explanation is that he could have pressed the ejector part way (so that the spent shells were part way out but still held there by friction. Then proceed to pull them out the rest of the way one at a time with his fingers.

A very reasonable explanation is that he could have pressed the ejector part way (so that the spent shells were part way out but still held there by friction. Then proceed to pull them out the rest of the way one at a time with his fingers.

Reasonable???....ROTFLMAO!....  I reject your silly idea as the excuse from a desperate person.   

[Charles Collins]

A very reasonable explanation is that he could have pressed the ejector part way (so that the spent shells were part way out but still held there by friction. Then proceed to pull them out the rest of the way one at a time with his fingers.

Reasonable???....ROTFLMAO!....  I reject your silly idea as the excuse from a desperate person.   

Exactly what do you believe is unreasonable about it?

[Walt Cakebread]

Exactly what do you believe is unreasonable about it?

Do you honestly think a fleeing killer would only eject the shells half way??    We know he tossed the spent shells away, so he wasn't concerned about saving the empty brass....  And since that's true, it's not reasonable to eject the shells half way.  He would have ejected them and let them fall on the ground.

It's clear to me that the killer was NOT using a Smith & Wesson.......I believe that he was using a revolver like a Colt or Ruger without a sawed off barrel.... Because his accuracy was excellent.....