Tippit Shooting, 1:15

[Charles Collins]

Even by the police account, he was not carrying a weapon when he was arrested (after the scuffle).

It had just been taken away from him during the scuffle by the DPD.

[John Iacoletti]

It had just been taken away from him during the scuffle by the DPD.

That's what Nick McDonald claimed, yes.  Nick McDonald claimed a lot of things.

[Charles Collins]

That's what Nick McDonald claimed, yes.  Nick McDonald claimed a lot of things.

Rumor has it that you were on the jury for the O.J. Simpson murder trial. Is that true?

[Walt Cakebread]

You have never explained how Tippit's Killer removed  ONE- SHELL - AT-A-TIME as he walked away from the murder scene.....The most logical explanation is: The killer was NOT using a S&W revolver. 

Maybe you should explain this "logic" of yours.

A very reasonable explanation is that he could have pressed the ejector part way (so that the spent shells were part way out but still held there by friction. Then proceed to pull them out the rest of the way one at a time with his fingers.

A very reasonable explanation is that he could have pressed the ejector part way (so that the spent shells were part way out but still held there by friction. Then proceed to pull them out the rest of the way one at a time with his fingers.

Reasonable???....ROTFLMAO!....  I reject your silly idea as the excuse from a desperate person.   

[Charles Collins]

A very reasonable explanation is that he could have pressed the ejector part way (so that the spent shells were part way out but still held there by friction. Then proceed to pull them out the rest of the way one at a time with his fingers.

Reasonable???....ROTFLMAO!....  I reject your silly idea as the excuse from a desperate person.   

Exactly what do you believe is unreasonable about it?

[Walt Cakebread]

Exactly what do you believe is unreasonable about it?

Do you honestly think a fleeing killer would only eject the shells half way??    We know he tossed the spent shells away, so he wasn't concerned about saving the empty brass....  And since that's true, it's not reasonable to eject the shells half way.  He would have ejected them and let them fall on the ground.

It's clear to me that the killer was NOT using a Smith & Wesson.......I believe that he was using a revolver like a Colt or Ruger without a sawed off barrel.... Because his accuracy was excellent.....   

[Charles Collins]

Do you honestly think a fleeing killer would only eject the shells half way??    We know he tossed the spent shells away, so he wasn't concerned about saving the empty brass....  And since that's true, it's not reasonable to eject the shells half way.  He would have ejected them and let them fall on the ground.

It's clear to me that the killer was NOT using a Smith & Wesson.......I believe that he was using a revolver like a Colt or Ruger without a sawed off barrel.... Because his accuracy was excellent.....   

We know it took extraordinary force to eject the spent shells with the ejector (Cunningham testimony). Perhaps he preferred holding the gun pointing down and allowing the un-spent cartridge(s) to stay in the cylinder, using gravity, while the partially ejected spent shells are picked out one at a time. You are the one that insists he removed them one at a time. I am answering your question as to how he might have done it.

[Walt Cakebread]

We know it took extraordinary force to eject the spent shells with the ejector (Cunningham testimony). Perhaps he preferred holding the gun pointing down and allowing the un-spent cartridge(s) to stay in the cylinder, using gravity, while the partially ejected spent shells are picked out one at a time. You are the one that insists he removed them one at a time. I am answering your question as to how he might have done it.

 You are the one that insists he removed them one at a time.

I'm merely repeating what witnesses said they saw....  They said they saw him walking away from the scene as he removed one spent shell at a time....And the shells that were found attested to the fact that he removed them one at a time, because they were found widely distributed. 

Perhaps he preferred holding the gun pointing down and allowing the un-spent cartridge(s) to stay in the cylinder,

Please present solid proof that there was any unfired cartridge in the gun.

I am answering your question as to how he might have done it.

R U serious??    You're proffering ridiculous ideas.......