Is it about truth or being right?

[Izraul Hidashi]

I thought this forum was supposed to be about truth? Why would grown men on a JFK Assassination Board try so desperately to ignore evidence & pretend they can't see what's in this photo? Maybe some people just can't see very well, so I made it easier to see.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/6EiurBtSnrwndJdo6

Does anyone wanna pretend they can't see that? If so, please explain why you would rather pretend & ignore it if this board is about truth.

Shall we also pretend that it doesn't line up perfectly with what we can see with our own eyes in the Zapruder film?

https://photos.app.goo.gl/fb42CPAFe5aBRZMZA

I get that some people may have been at this for a long time, and maybe they feel jealous that they didn't make that discovery. But to try so hard to ignore reality in favor of having to be right about your theory seems pretty narcissistic. At some point people have to decide if the truth is more the more important or just wanting to be right. Personally I don't care because it doesn't effect me or my ego one bit. I have 20/20 vision so I can see the 2 men with rifles just fine. Get over it.

[Barry Pollard]

Having viewed the first image I know what this is about and it's none of the above.  It's about that same guy who claims he got an original print of the Dillard photos and found LHO staring out one of the windows. Apparently he passed away recently but I have this funny feeling he'll be back soon.  That's just the kinda guy he is. 
We see it comrade, we just don't believe it and that's some sense of humour those hitmen have right?  Hiding from that specific camera but ignoring the scores of people on the street who could see them plain as day.
Want to see a UFO hovering over the murder sight seconds after the hit?  You got it.  Twenty assassins?  Just ask.  How many did our man have/like?  Six all told?

[Andrew Mason]

I thought this forum was supposed to be about truth? Why would grown men on a JFK Assassination Board try so desperately to ignore evidence & pretend they can't see what's in this photo? Maybe some people just can't see very well, so I made it easier to see.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/6EiurBtSnrwndJdo6

Does anyone wanna pretend they can't see that? If so, please explain why you would rather pretend & ignore it if this board is about truth.

Shall we also pretend that it doesn't line up perfectly with what we can see with our own eyes in the Zapruder film?

https://photos.app.goo.gl/fb42CPAFe5aBRZMZA

I get that some people may have been at this for a long time, and maybe they feel jealous that they didn't make that discovery. But to try so hard to ignore reality in favor of having to be right about your theory seems pretty narcissistic. At some point people have to decide if the truth is more the more important or just wanting to be right. Personally I don't care because it doesn't effect me or my ego one bit. I have 20/20 vision so I can see the 2 men with rifles just fine. Get over it.

Hi Izraul.  What do you see in this picture?:


I see two bears dancing.  Others see two Samurai engaged in martial arts. We can argue over what we see, but it is still just an inkblot. 

[Izraul Hidashi]

Amazing. So one excuse is that some guy who died but will be back did blah blah blah.

Only the photo isn't Pollard or whatever that is. It's the Moorman photo. And it doesn't matter which photo you use or from where you obtain it, they all show the same thing.  Because that's what Mary Moorman caught. Furthermore, the same 2 men can be seen other photos & video taken by other people.  So none of the intentional attempts to avoid the facts make sense.

The other lame excuse is an attempt to use some psychiatrist ink blot. LOL  WTF?  Seriously... just wtf?

That type of ignorance is outstanding. 

Unbelievable. The attempts to ignore what the Moorman photo shows are so extreme & pathetic, one has to wonder just what the mental issues are.

My advice. Get eyes checked. Then maybe go see psychiatrist that provided ink blot.  In the mean time, I've progressed in identifying who the 2 men may be.