Jack Ruby's Hat

[Richard Smith]

I'm surprised the contrarian hasn't pointed out that you can't actually see Ruby shoot Oswald in that film.  We are "assuming" it.  It is an opinion.  Therefore, we must conclude there is (false) doubt.  At best we can say that he pointed some object - perhaps made of wood - at Oswald at the exact moment he was killed. 

[Zeon Mason]

I'm surprised the contrarian hasn't pointed out that you can't actually see Ruby shoot Oswald in that film.  We are "assuming" it.  It is an opinion.  Therefore, we must conclude there is (false) doubt.  At best we can say that he pointed some object - perhaps made of wood - at Oswald at the exact moment he was killed.

Bill has been helping us a lot lately with little known facts like the stop sign knocked down at 1o th and Patton and now Rubys hat mysteriously laying on the ground AND photographed there too for some reason

[Richard Smith]

Bill has been helping us a lot lately with little known facts like the stop sign knocked down at 1o th and Patton and now Rubys hat mysteriously laying on the ground AND photographed there too for some reason

My comments aren't directed at Bill who is one of the sharpest guys here. 

[Thomas Graves]

I'm surprised the contrarian hasn't pointed out that you can't actually see Ruby shoot Oswald in that film.  We are "assuming" it.  It is an opinion.  Therefore, we must conclude there is (false) doubt.  At best we can say that he pointed some object - perhaps made of wood - at Oswald at the exact moment he was killed.

Yup.

And that the homicide detectives might have been wearing very long Bermuda shorts.

--  MWT 

[John Iacoletti]

I'm surprised the contrarian hasn't pointed out that you can't actually see Ruby shoot Oswald in that film.  We are "assuming" it.  It is an opinion.  Therefore, we must conclude there is (false) doubt.  At best we can say that he pointed some object - perhaps made of wood - at Oswald at the exact moment he was killed.

But we should just believe that Oswald shot Kennedy because “Richard” said so.

[Thomas Graves]

But we should just believe that Oswald shot Kennedy because “Richard” said so.

John,

The plethora of lies by hundreds of witnesses and/or principals in the sordid affair, not to mention the alarming number of those people who have died plus the obvious fact that there have been oh-so many film alterations, etc, etc, etc, prove that it was a Deep State Conspiracy, don't you think?

Especially since triple-agent Boris Orehkov (aka SHAMROCK) told J. Edgar Hoover in 1966 that the Kremlin had undertaken ... gasp ... a six-month investigation of the assassination right after it happened, and guess what it determined?

Yep, that Southern Right-Wing Oilmen and the Minutemen (later modified to include The Military Industrial Intelligence Community Complex), had done the deed!

Now, if you can't trust a KGB triple-agent, who the hell can you trust?

Wouldn't you agree?

--  MWT   

[Jerry Freeman]

I'm surprised the contrarian hasn't pointed out that you can't actually see Ruby shoot Oswald in that film.  We are "assuming" it.  It is an opinion.  Therefore, we must conclude there is (false) doubt.  At best we can say that he pointed some object - perhaps made of wood - at Oswald at the exact moment he was killed.

Richard Smith---Voted by his class as most likely to not succeed at much of anything

[Thomas Graves]

Richard Smith---Voted by his class as most likely to not succeed at much of anything

Yuk  Yuk  Yuk